In such a civilized society, in spite of several disagreements people have in various areas so far as one’s view goes, one point that virtually everybody upon is the importance of science. This is mostly owing to the fact that nowadays, science has become more important than a few decades ago and discoveries increase every day throughout the world. With this in mind, a broad range of controversial attitudes might stimulate heated debate as to whether these discoveries, which are obtained by governments and private companies, should be shared with the rest of the world or not. I personally believe that it should be announced obviously. Among the many reasons, one can give for this opinion, two conspicuous points will be elaborated through ensuing lines.
The first and prominent reason which comes to the mind is that by sharing these discoveries, it is possible to save our planet. Needless to say that, our planet has been encountered with several major problems. For instance, nowadays, almost all of the countries investigate global warming issue, which is one the important crisis, to find some solutions such as reducing of greenhouse effects in the atmosphere. In other words, every country is not able to face this phenomenon on its own. A recent international congress relating to this issue, held in my country and a comprehensive document reported in this regard. This document consists of numerous solutions that is one of the significant sources and provides future investigations. As a result, the cooperation of all governments and companies is needed to save the Earth.
Another important reason which deserves some words here is that it will give an opportunity for each government to improve easily. By sharing these discoveries, the governments will compete together in order to have a global fame and as a result, it will lead to detect new successive discoveries. According to a research conducted by United Nations, it was found that a vast majority of today’s discoveries in each country originate from the previous scientific discoveries obtained by rest of the countries. For instance, based on this record, Russian discoveries regarding the living possibility on the Marc originate from the United Stated previous reports.
In conclusion, there are numerous reasons which can be investigated. Based on the given reasons, which are saving the Earth and have a prosperous world, I highly recommend that governments and private companies should share their discoveries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...attitudes might stimulate heated debate as to whether these discoveries, which are obtained b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...roblems. For instance, nowadays, almost all of the countries investigate global warming is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28678304239 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00479402529 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551122194514 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4095878104 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.777777778 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2777777778 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15989429307 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477268201287 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042028474646 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979617751204 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012844766005 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.