The article posits that American wood companies are not too enthusiastic to join an international organization in order to become certified due to several reasons. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim and rejects each of the author's specific point made in the text.
First of all, based on the reading, there is no attention regarding product's appearance, whether they have been designed by certification labels or not. On the contrary, the lecturer strongly believes that the American people don't treat same against products. They distinguish between the advertised labels claimed by their own companies or an international agency. They usually react favorably and trust on certified products by ecological standards.
Second, although the author asserts that certified products will have higher costs than others, and customers will prefer to buy cheaper one, the lecturer refutes this point by saying that it is obvious that price is an important factor of any product, but for American people is important while the price of specific product is much higher or lower than other same products. Furthermore, when the price difference between two products is not noticeable, American customers will make their decision based on the value of the product and environmental issues.
Third, the reading suggests that most of the products are sold in the United States. Nevertheless, the professor states in the opposite side and contends that all American wood companies will attend this global organization because of competition. In addition, with increases in demand for certified products by American people, international markets will be developed in the United States. Thus the power of dominant companies will be reduced gradually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ongly believes that the American people dont treat same against products. They disti...
^^^^
Line 8, column 392, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...will be developed in the United States. Thus the power of dominant companies will be...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, third, thus, while, in addition, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49077490775 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83135259351 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564575645756 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.0962280352 49.2860985944 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450694343963 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148376002663 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636876302384 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251291398297 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453219134682 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.