Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people say that arts are more important than sports, so governments should spend more money in support of these. However, I do not agree with that statement and I believe that governments should spend more money in supporting athletics for three reasons.
First of all, Athletics events are renowned throughout the world and winning price in these events will increase the image of the country higher. For example, a third world country whose economy is not that good and not popular to general people throughout the world can get a lot of media coverage and popularity by winning a price from popular sports events like Olympic. However, if the country spends most of its money in support of art then they will not get the media coverage like the Olympic events as arts events are not that much popular to normal people. So, by spending more money on athletics a country can get lots of recognition and popularity.
Second of all, Athletics requires lots of money compare to arts. For example, for training different athletics need different instruments and different training grounds which involve a lot of money. On the other hand, most of the arts do not need a different environment and do not require that much money as all of them share lots of common ground. So, if the government spends more money in support of arts then larger porting of this money will be idle and will not be used for practical purposes. By spending the money on athletics, it is possible to gain the main purpose of investment.
Finally, spending more money on athletics will help to promote education in school and college. For example, a student who has talent in athletics gets a scholarship from government-sponsored athletics program and by this process, the lacking students who do not have money to study can participate in education. However, if the government does not spend money on the athletic sponsored program then these talented students will not be motivated to get an education as they do not have the money.
In conclusion, for these above three reasons, I think the government should spend more money in support of athletics than to spend in support of the arts.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: PRICE_PRIZE
Message: Did you mean 'prize' (reward)?
...ia coverage and popularity by winning a price from popular sports events like Olympic...
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: THIS_NNS
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
... support of arts than larger porting of these money will be idle and will not be used in pr...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, third, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87837837838 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65846086504 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.410810810811 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1685239471 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348150760326 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151028272602 0.076458572812 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118587425314 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257714291455 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121831151725 0.0645574589148 189% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.