Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams.
The effectiveness and outcomes of funding the arts, in fact, deliver a significant amount of profits and success among entire perspectives of society from individuals to communities for governments. Throughout human history, the arts play a vital role as the most efficient politics tools helping governments to maintain the harmonious balance of society. For instance, in the mid-twentieth century, various government-funded artworks, groups, and institutions emerged to alleviate the post-war depression and anxiety within the nation in the United States. Experiment in Arts and Technology, one of the prestigious government-funded art projects also known as E.A.T. exhibited enormously artworks of the combination of art and science and is successful at the same breath that smoothed citizens' fears to those giant machines which are a symbol as war. Nine nights theatre, an experimental art project organised by E.A.T. in 1966 is one of the successful events of propagandising the new public value and relieving the social turmoil for the United States' government. At some extent, these artworks fusing with the violence symbol and the humanism symbol alleviated the social anxieties of anti-war sentiment for most American people in the period. Governments' savage impression in publics' mind, therefore, gradually soften. Moreover, the golden age of 1970s and 1980s began with this transmutation which is an apparent butterfly effect that the arts softened the crack between the government and the public at first and then spread the range of its positive impact to every aspect of society. Based on this case, it is fair to say that supporting the arts is a brilliant and efficient decision for governments to improve social conditions.
On the other hand, even if athletics fairs such as state-sponsored Olympic fairs helps governments to deliver the economic prosperities sooner compared to the government-funded arts events, it is the aestheticisation of violence glorified the brutal competition. These competing behaviours would further catalysis the violent impulse of individual and then upgrade to collective violence disturbing the social stability. Various social acts of violence took place around the world during the World Cup in Russia this year. For example, dozens of fans conflicted with each other on the streets of London after England's loss. It is a worthless result for both the public and governments, which would lead to considerable turmoil in society. Furthermore, as the end of a sports fair, the mirage of the economic growth would gradually disappear, and many relative stadiums and buildings would be abandoned and idle, which would cause economic damage.
Thus, it is undoubted that sponsoring the arts is the most efficient means and the most profitable investment for governments from maintaining social stability to steading economy growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 952, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dle, which would cause economic damage. Thus, it is undoubted that sponsoring th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2444.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52941176471 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12285388316 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561085972851 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4517086825 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.75 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140262018617 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447255111772 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479897128492 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090684817475 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185508288137 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.01818996416 125% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.