Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Whether governments should invest more in arts or athletics is highly debatable. Different people will give different responses to this issue from their own characters, emotional concerns and even educational backgrounds. However, when it comes to me, governments should certainly spend more money in support of athletics for the following reasons.
To begin with, investment in athletics may potentially improve the honor of the state in people's mind. Athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams is a substantial figure that represents the spirit of the state. Knowing that the government is willing to invest in them, the teams will exert themselves in the exercise and strive for victory in the game. And when they achieve that, it will be an honor not only for the team, but also people of the state.
What's more, investment in athletics has always been more lucrative than that in the arts. As mentioned above, the investment substantially magnifies the chance the team will win the game. If they obtain that goal, the team, or at least some of its members will rise to fame, like a hero of the state. Not only his or her own value will soar, he or she can elicit a surge of advertisements, which is significantly profitable. On the other hand, the arts is more personal, less about material interests. For example, you have never seen a virtuoso in any milk advertisement. Hence, it is self-evident that there is more benefit in investing in athletics.
Admittedly, the arts apparently plays a crucial role of which athletics can hardly take place. Some people attach great importance to the joy of harmony when they are listening to a symphony of Beethoven. And some are absorbed in the impact that Van Gogh's masterpiece have on their mind. Nevertheless, bringing about the appreciation of the combination of strength and beauty, athletics also serves as a spiritual satisfaction for many people. Therefore, athletics is no less important than the arts in this facet.
On balance, with all the factors contemplated, we can safely reach a conclusion that governments should invest more in athletics than in the arts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...am, but also people of the state. Whats more, investment in athletics has alway...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, at least, for example, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09943181818 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94198460864 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553977272727 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6676352631 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.75 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22140959716 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674736360864 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764627794256 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128307607826 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577752678789 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.