Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades (marks) encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support opinion.
It is claimed that pupils, parents, and educators suppose that marks involve students to learn better than without grades. Undoubtedly, unsatisfactory marks or excellent marks are a measure of learners’ success; nevertheless, students should not suffer from rate races of good marks. However, pedagogical experts and academic professors remark on the essentiality of grades because it is a crucial part of the learning process, which has been developing for centuries. While superintendents of school districts and representatives of departments of education argue about the advantages and disadvantages of rating systems, pupils try to continue to receive tops grades.
There is a huge range of resources that confirms the importance of conventional education process grades during the curriculum and marks at the final exam. It would be unwise to deny that grades are the requirement part of the traditional education and examination. Furthermore, standardization and homogenization at this issue is the mandatory way for all learners. I dare say we would not have a lot of eminent scientists, outstanding artists, and great politicians without traditional grades, levels, or ranks.
By the same token, teachers should use grades for children and especially adolescents, to indicate the level of their knowledge and skills. On this occasion, researchers and the ministry of education prepare surveys and analyses that confirm that students' marks show the level of their knowledge and be an incentive for further education. Equally important to notice that this question is important not only for learners but also for their parents because they studied with grades at schools and universities
In contrast, it would be better to remark that grades are a measure of students’ success but only at schools, not in real life. Students need to have an issue that will be diverse them to each other. Along with that, this problem correlates to inclusion and cultural diversity at schools because we cannot recall historical, cultural sensitivities to the learning system.
In the final analysis, we should sum up all advantages of marks’ existence such as a convenient measurement of kids’ (teenagers) knowledge, an appropriate standard of the education system, and a fantastic diversification between students. However, young people, their brains and mentality are flexible to all new, and I am confident they will approve all future potential challenges with marks in their education.
- The table provides data on how people in five countries spent their money in the year of 2002 89
- The diagram shows the manufacturing process of bricks Describe the process
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 84
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Do you agree or disagree 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
... be an incentive for further education. Equally important to notice that this question ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, in contrast, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51436031332 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14476527533 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56135770235 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2768386297 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.8 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5333333333 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139253337111 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484462081316 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316062047249 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776784698092 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026279819819 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.002688172 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.