Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Although human activities have many negative impacts on Earth's ecosystem, there are many hopes and good activities as well. Personally, I believe that humans have learned from their mistakes and seek to recover Earth's ecosystem to a sustainable situation. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, thanks to advances in technology, humans now have the ability to undo all their mistakes, such as the emission of dangerous gases like carbon dioxide and methane that lead to global warming or increasing the total hunting that make some species to be extinct. Governments have the main role in fixing these kinds of problems. They should spend money and support the academic community to find possible solutions. New technologies help scientists to obtain important pieces of evidence and focus on finding a better solution. My experience is a compelling illustration of this. I have been working in the institute of ecosystem recovery, where we try to control and even decrease the temperature of the environment, especially small lakes. Our local governments have been awared of the threats of global warming and decided to cope with it. We have evaluated the situation of our lakes and found that in the near future, the life of all species of fish will be destroyed. Fortunately, the new cooling technology has helped us to manage the temperature in the small lakes, and we decide to use our novel approach for bigger lakes and gulfs.
Furthermore, linking the islands that they do not have any physical connection together help many species of animals and plants to be survived from their threats. In fact, animals that cannot resist to high-temperature can easily move to other cool locations. For instance, one of the most endangered animal in my country, called the Red-cat, cannot tolerate a temperature more than twenty-five centigrade. So their lives are in danger, and one of the solutions is to move them to cooler environments. The human activities, incidentally, cause to carry some of this rare animal to north places of our country. As a result, this beautiful cat is going to be survived, thanks to human activities.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that humans obtain insight into respect to their environments and try to fix their previous mistakes. I hold this opinion because of new technology that help us to improve ourselves, and the accidental positive effects of our activities.

Average: 9.1 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'carrying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: carrying
...e human activities, incidentally, cause to carry some of this rare animal to north place...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, incidentally, so, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06913580247 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87209001986 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572839506173 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2137691781 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.65 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101674661528 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0280742883395 0.076458572812 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303740887686 0.0737576698707 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615856233423 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371626811524 0.0645574589148 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.