Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study, or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before? Why?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
It totally depends on a person, but in my opinion, it is better if I can take courses taught by familiar professors that I have experienced their teaching and seen their class management. However, it is not an absolute decision and in many cases, I prefer to take a course with new professors. In fact, it is better if we consider the experience of previous students of the class that we want to take. But in any case and to answer this question approprately, there are two reasons why I hold this opinion, and I want to explain them.
First of all, underestanding standards and way that a professor uses to teach and manage class are time consuming tasks, and I usually prefer to take a class with someone whom I know him/her. In the other words, when you want to decide between two possible options and you are not sure about it, it is better to choose the sustanable option. In this case, because they want to give me a credit, I undoubtadly choose the professor that I know. For example, my friend and I took math and physic courses with a professor that we had many other courses with him and as a result, our credits were guaranteed.
Moreover, while many students, most of whom have average credit of B in all of their courses, have avoided any situation in which professors give them a project, I tent to accept it and I seek to find a professor to give me more credit from additional projects. In fact, this tendency is related to the point of view of person and it is important in order to find why some students want to do projects and others not. It is a subject of debate within the academic community and amongst scientists. In recent research of my university by taking a test from a heterogeneuos group of students, they have shown that more than 85 percent of students do not have any tendency to accept a research project instead of final exam in their courses. Ironically, they have found that less than 50 percent of students like to have practical projects without credit and just for improving their information. Therefore, it is important that the professor help students to improve their skills and be popullar, so students will select their courses in the following terms.
To sum up, it is important that the professor change the way of their teaching and in this way, other students and I prefer to take thier courses in future. However, these kinds of questions are so hard to answer, and in the meantime, I can say that I prefer to choose courses with some professors that I know.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ents and I prefer to take thier courses in future. However, these kinds of questions are ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in fact, as a result, first of all, in any case, in many cases, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53524229075 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61698944955 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464757709251 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.7863745523 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.6875 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.375 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0390872492966 0.236089414692 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0138315148466 0.076458572812 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0192007515687 0.0737576698707 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0245794133426 0.150856017488 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.010291613787 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.