Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
If we can’t say anything nice about someone, then we should not say anything about this person.
There are many different conditions in our lives when we need to talk about something or someone but there is no possitive point about that thing or person. We are going to focus on the situation when we want to talk about the behavior of individuals. Now, we have two choices; the first thing we can do is to be quite and say nothing, on the other hand, we can say what we know about him no matter is the consequence. While some people prefer to do the first method, personally, I perefer the second way because of two reasons which are about helping others to know that person better and illuminate that person’s own viewpoint about himself.
The first situation that comes to my mind immediately pondering this issue is when someone asks you about other person and expects you to help him because it will have great influences on his life. For instance, imagine a guy who wants to marry with your co-worker. working with her for several years, you are totally aware about her behavior. In my opinion, Therefore, we have to conduct that person because marrage is the one of the most important decisions in each person’s life, it can culminates the life or ruins it. To shed more light on it, when I wanted to marry with my first wife, I went to her office and asked one of employees about her. After talking about her well-manner personality, he suggested me to hold my wedding as soon as possible. So I believe in him and proposed my ex-wife and she said yes. Although she seemed nice while we were in the relationship, being under same roof changed my perspective about her. Not only was she untidy, but also she was selfish, both of behaviors that I hate. That marrage had longed only for about a year and devorce was its consequence. If that person told me about her manner correctly, it would not happen in my life.
Secondly, as a friend we must talk about our fellows bad manner with them, and help them to improve their characterestic. While some people become angry about hearing unpleasunt things about themselves, the smart individuals welcome these views because it helps them to understand their advantage and disadvantage points. In the other words, it is better to hear this comments from a friend instead of a stranger. To illustrate it, when I was at highschool, I had a friend, Hooman. having frank personality, he could not find many friends. Nevertheless, I liked him because he analyse my actions and told me which one was good and which one has to be changed. Our friendship has helped me to be a better person in society, who has less negtive points and more possitive ones. As a human everybody thinks he has the best characterestic, but it will be changed if somebody monitor others behavior impartialy. In my opinion, having a friend who pays attention to your behavior and notices your neggative and possitive points is a remarkable asset.
To make the long story short, according to the aforementioned arguments it is not essensial to talk nice about a person because some times talking about his less-developed parts of behavior can help both others and that person. Helping others in their choices related to that person and helping the person in order to make better version of himself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
There are many different conditions in our lives when we need to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 266, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Working
...who wants to marry with your co-worker. working with her for several years, you are tot...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'culminate'
Suggestion: culminate
...decisions in each person’s life, it can culminates the life or ruins it. To shed more ligh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he smart individuals welcome these views because it helps them to understand thei...
^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
... at highschool, I had a friend, Hooman. having frank personality, he could not find ma...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'analyses'.
Suggestion: analyses
...s. Nevertheless, I liked him because he analyse my actions and told me which one was g...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 596, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... liked him because he analyse my actions and told me which one was good and which...
^^
Line 3, column 696, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nged. Our friendship has helped me to be a better person in society, who has less...
^^
Line 3, column 874, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'monitors'.
Suggestion: monitors
...tic, but it will be changed if somebody monitor others behavior impartialy. In my opini...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, talking about, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 94.0 43.0788530466 218% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2661.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 568.0 407.700716846 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68485915493 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64423198305 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475352112676 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 841.5 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4943664238 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.346153846 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283032395033 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793553655445 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777585824085 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188417429346 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105048433928 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.