Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Universities do numerous things in order to improve the academic excellence of the college. In fact, it is important that these methods suffice all major needs of education. Many universities focus on libraries, laboratories and scientific methods to implement professional success. In my opinion however, raising the salary of the professors is the most important requirement to achieve the same due to a variety of reasons.
First of all, offering good salary to teachers is important because it will attract highly qualified and well experienced faculty, which is worth it for high standard education. Those professors have superior knowledge and understanding of the academic requirements than any junior teachers. For example, a university who provide high wage gets the highly competent teachers with more experience. A senior faculty who has ten years of experience can make realistic academic curriculum and distinguished lesson plans for the institution. Moreover, experienced teacher can simulate competent exam models which help students to perform well in national level examinations. Also, a senior faculty can guide other junior teachers, and the team work of all the faculty members together help the university to attain the professional standards and quality. Hence, paying higher salary is indispensable for professionally qualified teachers.
Secondly, providing teachers with high salary will enable them to fully dedicate their time and energy in the college work, which in turn reflect in students academic performance. As the lecturer is sufficiently paid, he do not have to worry about making extra money for his life expenditure, thus puts a hundred percent effort to academic work. In the aforementioned example, the senior faculty in my college was very well paid. She was so dedicated to her work by helping both the students and faculty. Her high salary package can be the reason behind her dedicated and excellent academic services. On the contrary, if she was not paid well, she may have to do some part time job to make her extra living. This may puts a physical toll on her health, and she may deliver mundane classes. Higher the salary, more productive the faculty member will be, hence, delivers appreciable academic lectures increasing the standards of education.
In conclusion, colleges should definitely consider paying sufficient salary to academicians to ensure quality education. Those colleges who pay less salary for teachers are more likely to get inferior and unprofessional faculty. hence, colleges should consider paying them good sum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...s the lecturer is sufficiently paid, he do not have to worry about making extra mo...
^^
Line 5, column 669, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... not paid well, she may have to do some part time job to make her extra living. This may ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...et inferior and unprofessional faculty. hence, colleges should consider paying them g...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46633416459 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95377033203 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551122194514 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8790726084 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6363636364 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2272727273 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.40909090909 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125858143051 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395853965558 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394819220792 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850733204069 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288146662664 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.