Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Quality of education is directly affected by the willingness of university professors. Professors are responsible for implementing high-quality tutoring, and if their salaries increase, it is likely to conclude that the quality they produce escalates. Though some people believe that universities should not spend more money on salaries of university professors, I believe that the more income they gain, the more inclined they are to conduct a high-quality education for students. With higher salaries, professors' motivation will increase, and their distraction caused by working in other jobs will diminish, leading to a better-quality education.
First, the increase in wages of professors results in higher motivation between them. Professors, just like other people, are in need of money and their contribution towards higher quality education is more efficient if they receive more salaries. The money will motivate them in a way that they try to bring on an impeccable teaching experience for their students. Teachers and professors are usually among the less paid labors of societies, although their contribution to communities is significant. The increase in their salaries will make them sure that their actions are important and others acclaim their efforts, leading to even higher motivation for them. As an instance, my father was a professor, and he received the minimum wage for years. After the cultural revolution in our country, his salary was raised, and he was highly motivated to exploit most of his abilities. He started working in his free time in order to catch up with his students' progress, and all of a sudden, he was not that unconcerned with his education duties.
Second, by earning more money from higher salaries, professors who work in other jobs can leave out their jobs and instead focus more on their academic performance, leading to better quality education. There are lots of professors and teachers out there that cannot follow up with the economic demands of their families and are working part-time in other non-academic jobs in order to obtain extra money. The increase in salaries by universities will make them independent of any outsource money hence they can focus more on their teaching activities. The escalation of focus by professors stems from eliminating the source of distraction, so they can spend more time carrying out the tasks related to academic activities. A research conducted by Harvard University scholars has proved that people are distracted when they participate in multi-tasks, and their effectiveness in all of their actions will diminish as a result of distraction. Since higher paid professors do not need to engage in other activities rather than the academic ones, they can focus more on the quality of their teaching, and their students can enjoy a higher-quality education.
Finally, I think that professors are one of the fundamental factors that can reinforce the prosperity of societies. The higher their wages, the higher they tend to implement a better education for students, since they are more motivated and less distracted than before. Consequently, I am of the opinion that professors deserve this raise, and their contributions to societies are highly-valuable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, hence, if, second, so, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2741.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36399217221 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00944244145 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446183953033 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 866.7 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8211828846 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.523809524 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216546303292 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801131010434 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601946299435 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157488468982 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835893658594 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.