Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In every modern society, the quality of education is vital for the advancement of the economy. The investment in education is needed to keep the education at high standard. Personally, I believe that giving a good compensation to professors is beneficial for the quality of education. I will explore this the following paragraphs.
First of all, best pay for professor allows colleges to be competitive on the job market, which is the key to the quality of teaching. In fact, most of the well-educated scholars quit their teaching jobs to join other organizations that will pay them more money. Therefore, universities should pay faculties with good benefits. My alma mater is the best example of this. Boston Community College (BCC), where I studied computer sciences, five years ago, had the best professors in the whole region. However, the college didn't provide the best salaries and benefits, which the lecturers needed to survive in this expensive city. Last year, when the tech companies started to open their offices in the city most of best teachers left the teaching job because of attractive pay from those companies. Consequently, BCC has bad rating in quality of teaching, especially due to lack of qualified lecturer. Had BCC provided the excellent salaries to professors, it would have stayed on the top quality of education.
Furthermore, the high salary for teachers and professors will make this profession attractive to young people. Nowadays, students go to college to prepare their future careers, and the most motivation is money for some young people. If the teaching career is rewarding, the schools would attract the best talents, which is a huge contribution to the improvement quality of learning. For instance, I graduated with honor in my class, and after my graduation I had multiple offers from colleges and privet companies. I chose to work for one tech company because they had better wage and addition incentives. I personally like to teach but I couldn't take the job at my college because the benefit package was very unattractive. As you can see, many talented people like me choose not to go to academia because of the bad pay, which affects the quality of education in future.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that college should spend more money on salaries to improve quality of education. Not only will the schools keep the best lecturers, but also, they will attract young talents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... the whole region. However, the college didnt provide the best salaries and benefits,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 709, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
... to open their offices in the city most of best teachers left the teaching job because ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 640, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...tives. I personally like to teach but I couldnt take the job at my college because the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 863, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... which affects the quality of education in future. In conclusion, I strongly believe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 874, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts the quality of education in future. In conclusion, I strongly believe that c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0875 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82218775952 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5275 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1644863043 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86363636364 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206100906697 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632885980861 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543866397749 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137534792445 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176917748121 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.