Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today, vehicles play a larger part in transportation. Cars are used in main ways from personal use to commercial. Some think that the need for automobile will keep increasing in future, while other disagree. In my opinion, the number of cars in twenty year from today will drop remarkably.
To begin with, in order to protect environment people are buying less cars. As we can see, most of cars today use non-renewable energy, which produce greenhouse gases. These gases play crucial role in global warming. Nowadays, there are many campaigns to reduce the pollutants which come from cars’ fume. As a result, people are being aware of this problem and reduce the personal cars. For example, I work in big city, there are numerous offices, and most people includes my co-workers lives out of the cities. Two years ago, there were many people driving to cities, and you could see how the quality of the air were changing. Recently, however, some non-governmental organization started movement to request people to rescue the driving time. My employer provided some incentive to people who take train or bike to work. This promotion forced many employees to adopt public transportation. This trend will likely grow in the future and reduce the cars in streets.
Furthermore, new technology is creating the best way of transportation, which will replace the current cars. The autonomous cars will be used to transport many peoples form the same area; this carpooling is a big solution to larger number of cars today. In additional to that most of car sharing companies, like Uber, are planning to introduce those type of technology to make the transportation more easily, especially by using less cars. Other projects in progress includes building more tunnels and suspended bridge to facilitate new public transportation method. If these projects became reality, we are going to have fewer cars in future compare to the number of vehicles we have today.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that number will drop in next twenty years, this is because people are becoming mindful about climate change and reduce car usage, and also the new high-tech technology will allow people to carpool, which will change transportation system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...eed for automobile will keep increasing in future, while other disagree. In my opinion, t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...o protect environment people are buying less cars. As we can see, most of cars today...
^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the cars') or simply say ''most cars''.
Suggestion: most of the cars; most cars
...le are buying less cars. As we can see, most of cars today use non-renewable energy, which p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...tation more easily, especially by using less cars. Other projects in progress includ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1397260274 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76277428483 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558904109589 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1763451791 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.380952381 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198588780001 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593481119508 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616574642818 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136020605324 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536446832523 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.