Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The quality of education is a momentous issue because it influences the future of the country. There are many different ways to improve the quality of education. Foremost, one way is increasing the salary of professors which is a superficial solution to improve the quality of education. In my view, increasing the salary of professors can not be beneficial. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my idea is that, the knowledge of professors is stable, even by spending more salary on them, so it can not be a lucrative choice. On the other hand, there are many ways for spending money which are more significant to improve the quality of education. Seen from another angle, universities can spend this money to progress the facilities of the university. For instance, universities can develop the library and the equipments required for laboratories. subsequently, spending money on these kinds of issues can pave the way for the educational process for students moreover.
Add to this, the second reason is that professors who have more salary can spend it on few students also it can help to improve the quality of education fewer students justly. In other words, in lots of universities, as some professors do high-tech projects, they have to hire students to help them in their projects, consequently, they are supposed to pay the amount of money to their students. In short, these projects can have a beneficial influence on the quality of education of few students. On the whole, universities have to spend more money on improving the quality of education for all students. Subsequently, it can lead to equality between students that causes to improve the quality of education.
To wrap everything up, I do not count myself among the proponents of the latter idea. In my opinion, spending more money on evolving the facilities of the university and projects which all students can collaborate, can have more lucrative influences on the quality of education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...es the future of the country. There are many different ways to improve the quality of educatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Subsequently
...e equipments required for laboratories. subsequently, spending money on these kinds of issue...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 674, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: improving
...o equality between students that causes to improve the quality of education. To wrap ev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, for instance, in short, in my opinion, in my view, in other words, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11504424779 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00807150563 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436578171091 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4749060865 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302424489694 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116029003863 0.076458572812 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725932617898 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200815277402 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517870367204 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.