Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Teachers have different strategies to evaluate students, which can be efficient for their knowledge, too. Doing projects is one crucial activity that can cause both teachers' goals. There is doubt whether doing a project in a group is more effective or by an individual. Personally, I believe that if students work together in a group, the students may learn more effectively. I feel this way because of two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

First of all, by doing a project in a group, students can improve their information significantly. One student may have limited information about the project's title and even have a wrong understanding of one concept. Subsequently, it can lead to having a project with low quality, which can influence her/his mark; also, the student may do not understand his/her weakness. Since a group consists of different students with various levels of knowledge, so they can have influences on their level of knowledge. Eventually, students can help each other to improve their knowledge and understand concepts deeply.

Secondly, doing a project in a group can cause to create a project with extensive sources and information. Because students have a finite time to do their project, they can not search on the internet or read different books individually as much as they can do in a group. On the other hand, if students work together, they can achieve more information because everyone, in a group, can search on various sources. In short, they can study their project on different aspects.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that doing projects in a group has a beneficial influence on both students' knowledge and projects' quality. This is because it can help them to improve their knowledge and because each student in a group can find different sources, which leads to the project's result be comprehensive.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: creating
...y, doing a project in a group can cause to create a project with extensive sources and in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...roup has a beneficial influence on both students knowledge and projects quality. This is...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, i feel, in conclusion, in short, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 307.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11726384365 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90495312627 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465798045603 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2061232532 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1875 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255287452777 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115764272225 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536303221573 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193581614898 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460921236662 0.0645574589148 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.