Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people say that to improve the quality of education, universities should invest money on better study environments, better books, and better classrooms. However, I do not agree with this stance and believe that to improve the quality of education, it is necessary to invest money on the salaries of the professors for three reasons
First of all, without getting the proper salaries, the professors will not be interested in a particular university. For example, if a university aims to get better professors so that the quality of education of the university increases but offers lesser than average salaries that others are providing, no high-quality professor will not be interested in joining the university. By providing minimum salaries, it is not possible to recruit top-quality professors. However, if the university starts giving proper salaries to the professor then renowned professors will join the university and the quality of the education will also enhance.
Second of all, if the universities do not spend more money on salaries then the professor will not be motivated to work hard to increase the quality of education. For example, in my county, professors get extra incentives from the university as well as the government if they show extra dedication in improving the quality of education like doing publications, motivating students. On the other hand, a university that does not encourage its professors by giving them incentives like a yearly bonus, best teacher incentive, top contribution on education bonus then the professors will not be motivated to work hard as they know that they will get the same salaries even if they work harder.
Finally, top-class students will not be motivated in joining the teaching profession if they find that there are not enough salaries in this profession which in turn results in decreasing the quality of education. For example, in my country, the professors get a lot of extra incentives like housing loans, car loans, yearly bonuses, etc. As students know about these incentives, they are motivated to join in the teaching profession and helps to improve the quality of education. On the other hand, if the government and university would not have provided these incentives then most of the top students would not be motivated to join as a professor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
...giving them incentives like yearly bonus, best teacher incentive, top contribution on ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 681, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...same salaries even if they work harder. Finally, top class students will not be ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this profession' or 'these professions'?
Suggestion: this profession; these professions
...d that there are not enough salaries in these profession which in turn results in decreasing the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, well, for example, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16266666667 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87545814707 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418666666667 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2213598551 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.923076923 100.406767564 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8461538462 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29218730569 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126118902716 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850505282065 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1995007543 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656005185049 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.