Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Sentiments diverge on whether to fortify the education quality, universities should take care about the expanding in university professors’ remuneration. Although some formidable censors this stance since it will make students pay more in fees, I am in the opposition owing to some rational reasons.
To begin with, more money will boost the professors' motivation in teaching since they feel more responsibility in their job. To be more accurate, money plays a role as an external effect for the professors when they receive a handsome payroll, they have to prepare or teach for the student which value will be similar to the expanded salaries. Therefore, professors develop some effective methods for the lecture or focus on the student in class leading to the increase in the quality of education. In the interim, professors will stay longer in the class at the end of lessons for solving the problems from students and will be more comfortable and enthusiastic when the student makes contact with them through the media or tries to answer the question in deepfully way.
Furthermore, some of the teaching tools and resources which are helpful for teaching will meet the requirement since the professors have ability to access based on the expanded salary. This is because most resources in teaching are extremely beneficial for teaching; however, it is quite expensive. Hence, with the extra money to the professor, they will update the supporting items in class resulting in an easier way for students to approach the knowledge such as the illustration image, researching paper, video regarding the lecture field. Take my physics class as an example, my teacher cannot have enough money to spend on the experiment stuff which is a big obstacle to us to understand some abstract concepts. Thus, my school provides money to him so he can access those materials for our lessons. As a result, students are able to gain a difficult knowledge.
In the end, the extra money from the university pay for the professor will somehow make a big step in updating the education quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...o begin with, more money will boost the professors motivation in teaching since they feel ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...tion in deepfully way. Furthermore, some of the teaching tools and resources which are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 846, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'difficult knowledge'.
Suggestion: difficult knowledge
... As a result, students are able to gain a difficult knowledge. In the end, the extra money from th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09329446064 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78953447823 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542274052478 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.737315777 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.384615385 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206508963379 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793172534122 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555957353735 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140989575355 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241870551119 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.