Modern buildings that surround us and support our daily life is being constructed more and more. No doubt they will become even more as the population continues to grow and as the living quality becomes more and more critical to modern people. Thus, some people support that it is better for government to spend money on building modern housings than on preserving historic or traditional buildings and homes. However, I believe that government should pay more attention to protecting and restoring historic buildings than building modern housings.
First of all, while modern buildings are necessary to people's activities, such as working in offices, watching movies in theaters, and living in houses, the existence of historic and traditional buildings to some extent is also an indispensable factor to our society and our country. For instance, an old building could record a piece of history about a country or a society. When we enter into an old house and take one step on stairs or touch the stone wall, it would recalls us to imagine our ancestors how to live in the house. Meanwhile, ancient palaces and castls can also make tourists surprised no matter they come from overseas or they are local citizens. Therefore, preserving historic and tradictional buildings is supposed to be as the same crucial as building modern housings.
Additionally, protecting and repairing old buildings is a duty of local government. Because of the current circumstance where most of historic buildings are belong to government and there are some laws that forbid people to destory or rebuild ancient buildings, government should pay enough money on preserving these buildings. And considering most of modern housings are constructed by commercial corporations and these housing are used to make profits, there is no need for government to waste money to support the building of these housing.
In the other hand, some people insist that it is a good avenue for government to spend money on modern building in order to improve the quality of people's living environment. Nevertheless, although we have no definite evidence to say that commercial companies can cover our all requirements or perform better than government from all perspective, but it is absolutely true that most of buildings we live in are built by commercial companies and most of us are satisfied with them.
In a word, I think that it is not better for government to spend money on modern buildings than preserving ancient housings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...re. No doubt they will become even more as the population continues to grow and as...
^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'recall'
Suggestion: recall
...tairs or touch the stone wall, it would recalls us to imagine our ancestors how to live...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...ce where most of historic buildings are belong to government and there are some laws t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the buildings') or simply say ''most buildings''.
Suggestion: most of the buildings; most buildings
...pective, but it is absolutely true that most of buildings we live in are built by commercial comp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think, no doubt, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15970515971 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85934498847 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469287469287 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.7221085751 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1333333333 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41590532574 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172767279039 0.076458572812 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144113126874 0.0737576698707 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28003800043 0.150856017488 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865540935382 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.