Regardless of the increasingly complicated relationships among modern people, honesty is still regarded as a cherished characteristic when it comes to evaluating other people. Therefore, it is not beyond people‘s expectation that someone gives priority to honesty when selecting a leader for any kind of organization. However, according to my preference and experience, there are other two factors that are more worth noticing.
To begin with, instead of being honest, the ability to plan and organize is the most essential characteristic for a student leader for the sake of a smooth progress of the student affairs. In other words, competent leaders are those with detailed plans and clear goals in their mind. Otherwise, the whole group will easily get lost on the way and lose the impetus to strive for their common goals. By making a detailed plan and carrying it out step by step, a group leader is not only capable of pushing forward and complete the preset projects but also able to keep the team members away from distrust and anxiety. For example, if a leader of English Association is going to conduct an English speaking contest, he is required to figure out the concrete process of a speaking contest, the cost related to the applied facilities as well as the assignment for each individual in the group. All of the mentioned merits cannot be gain from only telling the truth.
Besides, whether the candidate for the student leader masters the art of communication is also more worth noticing than being honest. It is no denying that the leader of a student organization is exposed to various chances to interact with group members encompassing students of distinct personality traits. Therefore，it is of paramount importance for the leader to be possessed with the ability to relate well with others. More importantly, only by well coordinating the relations among the team members can the student leader be capable of ensuring the smooth progress of the organization. To illustrate, if conflicts arise among team members during the process of crucial projects, the leader has the obligation to properly settle the disagreement by skillfully calming them down with maybe witty words and then take measures to cope with the problems.
Admittedly, it is indisputable that honesty should not be neglected in terms of choosing a leader. After all, honesty has a lot to do with obtaining trust and creating a harmonious atmosphere among the whole group. It is natural that people usually rely on an honest person without reservation. Nevertheless, it is still not wise enough to regard it as the most crucial factor in terms of choosing a leader for student organizations for honesty does not testify to one‘s ability and competence in dealing with group projects.
To sum up taking the ability of planning and organizing as well as communication skills into consideration it is too rash to put honesty first when choosing a leader for student organizations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'smooth progress'.
Suggestion: smooth progress
...ic for a student leader for the sake of a smooth progress of the student affairs. In other words,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 890, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...nment for each individual in the group. All of the mentioned merits cannot be gain from on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, well, after all, for example, kind of, as well as, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2504.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13114754098 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95501750589 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514344262295 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 777.6 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0300641746 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.789473684 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6842105263 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36842105263 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408453193354 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12616055005 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885571320797 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228139870719 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581453475785 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.