Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to be a member of a group than to be a leader of a group. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Although, some people consider leader's job so easy and pleasant, in reality it is not. I definitely agree with the following statement that is far better to be a member of a group and I will provide some supporting explanations in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, all people who identify themselves as a leader know what kind of responsibility they carry on. Consequently, they are often obliged to work excessively and spend tremendous amount of their time in pondering. No one can deny how painstaking is when we play as a leader due to the additional assignments or unforeseen situations. For example, my previous boss at a restaurant where I worked was an excellent leader. He had the ability to assemble a unique team of people who work diligently. However, he spend double of our time making numerous other things. I remember once when we closed the restaurant he stayed late night in order to finish a compulsory inventory. Therefore, if I put myself into his shoes, I would figure out that his professional life is not easy and that is one reason to consider better being a member of a team.
In addition, leaders are absolutely involved in a process of working and even a small mistake can lead them to an abyss of the failure. Accordingly, they might lose their job and suffer from profound depression. There is no shortage of opinion that leaders are people who organize, cohere and train their members according to a particular rules and measures. If something is in haywire, leaders are blamed for that. For example, my cousin's supervisor wasn't nonchalant leader, however he was meeting many arduous situations. In fact, the position was quite stressful to him because he made numerous mistakes. Moreover, he couldn't finish some imperative assignments on time and often delayed with sending them to CEO. As a result, they fired him and he felt into deep depression. If he hadn't been a leader, he would have avoided the depression.
In conclusion, I believe that there are more advantages to be a member of a group compare to be a leader. It is because members possess with more free time for themselves. Hence, they can use the time to be with their families or significant other. Also, members of a group are off the hook and don't have fears that someone might kick them out of the workplace due to the failure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 518, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...people who work diligently. However, he spend double of our time making numerous othe...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...hat. For example, my cousins supervisor wasnt nonchalant leader, however he was meeti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...he made numerous mistakes. Moreover, he couldnt finish some imperative assignments on t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 785, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...and he felt into deep depression. If he hadnt been a leader, he would have avoided th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...members of a group are off the hook and dont have fears that someone might kick them...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77530864198 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82570559362 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540740740741 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4919068009 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0869565217 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6086956522 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08695652174 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223013128878 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618203889725 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091798850877 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17257223476 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103620808358 0.0645574589148 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.