Imagine that you have received some land to use as you wish. How would you use this land? Use specific reasons and example to support your answer
Although, there are numerous cases in which a land is considered as useless and it is deteriorated by human activities, a land can be used in multitudinous ways. If I were given a land, I would definitely use it for agricultural purposes for several reasons which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First of all, any land can be fertilized and plowed in order to be prepared for a growing. I would use it for cultivation of copious vegetables. Consequently, I can lay the ground of a natural and organic tomatoes or potatoes which I would use for domestic consumption or trade. No one can deny that recently every person looks for vegetables which are without GMO or other pesticides. In fact, I would not adhere on any punctilious measures of how to grow my vegetables and instead of adding hazardous elements for a human, I would follow natural practices according to a biodynamic. A friend of mine had an inherited land, which he used for growing cherry trees. As a matter of fact, he was the same person as me, critical toward contemporary ways of growing crops and cultivating trees. He begun reading books how to grow without adding chemicals and how to tackle with agricultural illnesses. After he implemented everything what he learned from books, ended up with amazingly blossom cherry trees scattered all over the land. One year later can created trade relationships with a wholesale companies.
In addition, if I had a land for myself to use for cultivation, I would definitely create a essential job for workers and people who have notion about agriculture. Accordingly, they would help me find best methods to develop my land and to attain success. There is no shortage of opinion that we can not accomplish anything without necessary knowledge, education and even manual labor. By finding a job for indigenous people, I would be tranquil and exulted because I am not only helping myself financially, but also espouse local essential workers for their subside. I remember my grandfather when he had a huge backyard and turned into a honey producing area. He brought honeybees and all necessary tools. After a while, bees started to produce honey superfluously, therefore additional workers were needed aside from me and my grandfather. Then some neighbors who lost their job could help us for some wage.
In conclusion, If I had a land I would use it wisely to cultivate crops and produce organic comestibles. It is because I can either sell it or consume it as I am assured that is natural and organic without noxious chemicals sprayed. Also, it will be advantageous over any other needs because I can provide a job for people who are in urgent need.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 794, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'began'?
Suggestion: began
...growing crops and cultivating trees. He begun reading books how to grow without addin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... cultivation, I would definitely create a essential job for workers and people wh...
^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'find the best'.
Suggestion: find the best
...ulture. Accordingly, they would help me find best methods to develop my land and to attai...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, if, look, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84716157205 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93725826704 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528384279476 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.443241249 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5217391304 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9130434783 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65217391304 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17192265058 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059051703796 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064072002579 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128542750672 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535574046858 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.