Nowadays it has already been impossible for one to master knowledge in all fields. Plus the fact that new knowledge always emerges much faster than one eager learner can catch up, we have to resort to only select some knowledge to learn. Then there is a debate about whether it is better to learn broadly than to specialize in one specific subject. Personally, I agree that it is better to learn broadly.
Having a broad knowledge can add to the happiness of life. If one knows about anything, s/he can always have a nice talk with any friends because there are always topics familiar to both of them. Besides, during the chat one can also explore many other topics and probably there are some topics that the friend are not familiar with but interested in. Then the chat can move on with this new topic, from which one receives a sense of achievement and the friend also feels the vision widened. Therefore, the life will be much more interesting, since socialization is truly one of the most important parts of life.
Besides the aspect of happiness, having broad knowledge is also essential for it prevents one from being deceived. Nowadays cheaters always claim themselves as government administrators and demand victims who know little about government policies to transfer money to them. Apparently, armed ourselves with broader knowledge can prevent us from being cheated, but specializing in one specific subject, even to an extent as being a professor does no help at all. For example, it was once reported that a professor in my university was cheated and lost more than 10 million yuan. Therefore, it is crucial to have broad knowledge in order to better protect ourselves.
Moreover, having broad knowledge becomes necessary when it comes to educating our own children. In the early period of education, only common knowledge is enough, and getting in touch with knowledge of more subjects is recommended for it could provide more opportunities for the children to find and develop interests in what are truly suitable for them. Besides, it is not feasible for children to understand unfathomable concepts. In this sense, it is not so helpful to specialize but to learn broadly.
Specializing, certainly, has its own merits. Had there been no scientists, the world would become full of insipidness. But not everyone is suitable or willing to be a scientist. Plus that many scientists are having broad knowledge as well, we should always learn broadly at first. Only after that can we start specializing.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99052132701 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72388597721 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526066350711 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5293341593 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5652173913 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.347826087 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95652173913 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302264847473 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085511147508 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813861034563 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171695168841 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761615712569 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.