Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to hold a big
party and invite many people to come than a small party where only a few close
friends and family members are invited
Since the dawn civilization, party has had one of the greatest role in people’s lives all over the world. Although some people believe that holding big party and inviting more people is better, I firmly concur with the idea that small party with close friends is better. There are some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
Firstly, it is undoubted that so important have close friends been that they have had a great number of positive effects on people's lives around all over the world, yet above all they have helped each other in wide variety of circumstance. As a matter of fact inviting close friends and families is better because we spend much more time with them. To illustrate this fact, one needs only refer to numerous people solving their problems easily with helping their close friends. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. There was a time that I had held a party that I invited a lot of people and I could not spend my time with my close friends resulting in they had become upset due to that I made our relationship weaker than the past and I cannot count on them when I have problem now. I strongly believe that had I invited my friends, I would have mad strengthen our relationship by spending more time with each other.
Secondly, It is established beyond doubt that, on the one hand, some people believe that people should invite more people because they can receive more gifts, yet on the other hand, some people believe that if people invite more people, they would expense a lot of money are to hold the party better. I strongly agree with the latter point and I do believe that the more people invite their close friends, the less they should expense their money on party because the people who are not close with you do not give you valuable gifts. By way of illustration, the noteworthy intelligible results, show that approximately 90 percentage of student holing big party, are the ones who have monetary problem and they have to take a part-time job to compensate their expenses.
To make a long story short, by considering all aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes no one can deny the enormous positive effects of holding small party with close friends on people's lives. Not only are they able to make their relationship more closer, but also they can save a hoard of money. Foe this reasons, I highly recommend that people hold smaller party because it brings them several lucrative consequences like what mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...re they able to make their relationship more closer, but also they can save a hoard of mone...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2096.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77448747153 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48957748762 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476082004556 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.1026548871 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.733333333 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2666666667 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245364441476 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936441438391 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829043043272 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169879496694 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044828554267 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.