Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, human relationships have engendered copious controversies among authorities. One of the questions which is often raised regarding this issue is whether we should make friends with intelligent people or with the people who have good sense of humor. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that making friends with intelligent people is better, while others believe that making friends with people having good sense of humor is more beneficial. I, despite the general consensus, contend that making friends with both of them is beneficial. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that being friend with intelligent people can help us to reach our goals. In fact, they can pave our way toward our goals. In view of the fact that they are intelligent, they can understand our problems and give assistance to us to address our problems that we may encounter throughout our life. To demonstrate, most of the sociologist all over the world contend that the people having intelligent friends can solve their daily problems they are dealing with better. So, they established an experimental program worldwide to examine the effect of having intelligent friends on peoples’ progression. The result are surprising: over 90 percent of successful businessmen asserts that they rely on their friends, especially those are more intelligent, when they encounter a difficult situation in their life.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, no one could neglect the effect of friends having a good sense of humor on our life. In fact, they can make us happier. Moreover, by making friend who have good sense of humor we can get away from psychological problems, and this can help to reduce the disappointing rate of mental illnesses. For instance, severe, disabling mental illness has dramatically increased in the United States. A tally of those who are so disabled by mental disorders that they qualify for Supplemental Social Security Income or Social Security Disability Insurance increased two and a half times between 1987 and 2007, as it is summarized in The New York Times Book Review; although this problems are intertwined with many difficulties, making friends with those who have good sense of humor can help people to forget their problems and put them in a better place mentally.
Taking all aforementioned arguments into account leads us to the conclusion that being friend with different people who have different characteristic is vital to have a flourish life. Intelligent people can help us to solve our problems easily, also the people who have good sense of humor make us happier and help us to forget our problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 511, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...umor is more beneficial. I, despite the general consensus, contend that making friends with both ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, no one could neglect th...
^^
Line 5, column 728, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...he New York Times Book Review; although this problems are intertwined with many diff...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, apart from, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20805369128 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85873129012 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474272930649 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.3236293817 48.9658058833 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424161535531 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15420303254 0.076458572812 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154984747003 0.0737576698707 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313276588614 0.150856017488 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139378564258 0.0645574589148 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.