do you agree or disagree with the following statement? it is better safe than sorry.
us">being cautious is an inherent warning that is the best way to protect against the hazard. dangers are surrounding us, and we need to be cautious. our ancestors learned that working should be done more cautiously for surviving, and every careless means that were surviving will fall in danger. Nowadays, our world is not as dangerous as our ancestors experienced, but our world also has distinct perils that we should be aware of and put safety first so i agree with this statement.
us">First of all, I would like to say that we should be cautious due to unstoppable hazards around us, which can hurt us, so we should be knowledgeable about dangerous subjects and the solving methods. Some of these dangers happen in one minute but affect for a long time. For example, an earthquake is a critical event that we should know about. Furthermore, we should allocate safe places for necessary situations and check these places for the probability of danger.
us">The second point that I would like to mention is that we should do our affairs as well as possible. It is our job because we should know that every work we do will return to us. Your sins will find you out. so now we should do our duty as safe instead of being sorry in the future. For instance, near our home, there was an apartment made by an architect, and he did not work correctly and ignored safety instructions. he cut corners. because of his neglect, one worker died, and he was confronted with different problems for a long time.
us">
us">To sum up, neglect of safety issues is easier than working carefully, but we will be engaged in consistent suffering due to neglect. also, the lull is along with attention to safety issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Us&apos
us'>being cautious is an inherent warning ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Dangers
...best way to protect against the hazard. dangers are surrounding us, and we need to be c...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Our
...ounding us, and we need to be cautious. our ancestors learned that working should b...
^^^
Line 1, column 463, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...uld be aware of and put safety first so i agree with this statement. us'&...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Us&apos
...irst so i agree with this statement. us'>First of all, I would like to say t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... these dangers happen in one minute but affect for a long time. For example, an earthquake...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Us&apos
...laces for the probability of danger. us'>The second point that I would like ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...urn to us. Your sins will find you out. so now we should do our duty as safe inste...
^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...rectly and ignored safety instructions. he cut corners. because of his neglect, on...
^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...ed safety instructions. he cut corners. because of his neglect, one worker died, and he...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Us&apos
... different problems for a long time. us'> us'>To sum up, neglect...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roblems for a long time. us'> us'>To sum up, neglect of safety...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...in consistent suffering due to neglect. also, the lull is along with attention to sa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83666666667 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84892767351 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.3290097318 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3529411765 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 5.5376344086 235% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0862073758592 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326166329293 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406558383434 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561728014649 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032626949892 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.