Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is easier to maintain good health today than in the past.
Nobody can overlook the fact that in this progressive and sophisticated world, where we live, paying attention to good health plays a considerable role in the quality of people`s lives. While some folks hold the opinion that keeping good health is more accessible today than before, others stand at the other side of this continuum and believe the opposite. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the latter group and my justifications to substantiate this point of view are elaborated hereupon.
To begin with, maintaining good health can not be achieved without having a healthy diet. As everybody knows, the quality of food was much higher in the past, compared to these days. To be more specific, nowadays farmers use various kinds of chemical fertilizers, and pesticides to improve the efficiency of their land to gain more profit, however, all of those chemical substances can cause terrible effects on human`s health and leads to different sorts of diseases such as cancer, stomach problems and so on. However, in the past, all of the farm products used to be produced by natural fertilizer. For example, past farmers used to apply the debris of plants and trees, and also animal fertilizers for the soil enrichment, nevertheless, according to my research, these days farmers use nitrogen, and phosphate for the soil enforcement. As a result, in the past, people had high-quality food.
Furthermore, a healthy lifestyle needs regular exercise that is difficult in modern life. In other words, in the past, owing to the lack of technology, most of the tasks had to be done by people`s hands. For instance, people used to do physical activity for milling their grains, preparing their land for farming, and even for building the required object for life. Whereas, in these days by technological improvements, humankind has faced with a sedentary lifestyle in front of the computers. Also, because of the hectic life, the folks are highly busy, consequently, can not find any free time to go to the gyms and do some exercise. Therefore acquiring good health is noticeable hard these days in comparison to the past.
In a nutshell, according to the aforementioned reasons, having good health was easier in the past not only because of the organic food but also for the more motion that people had during their lifetime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...oblems and so on. However, in the past, all of the farm products used to be produced by na...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 642, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...to go to the gyms and do some exercise. Therefore acquiring good health is noticeable har...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07216494845 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88028926782 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559278350515 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.334168567 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.45110844103 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196398081711 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646958989448 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512022774132 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120008308247 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213707267345 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.