Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Although we live in a peaceful world, wars are still happening in some countries. While air could be fresh in our own country, there is severe air pollution in other areas. From my point of view, these events, though may not appear in our daily life, also need attaching great importance.
To begin with, every event can teach us solutions to the problem. Even though some events seem unlikely to happen and will not exert great impacts on our daily life, the methods could be incredibly meaningful when we meet with the same kind of problems. For instance, last year a factory in Japan exploded as a result of the dangerous chemicals, leading to large pollution to the sea. Although the sea between Japan and China can prevent the pollution from impacting seafood near China, we'd better clearly know why this explosion happened and how we should avoid this kind of event in Chinese factories. Hence, what renders those events important to us is not the event itself, but the measures taken in addressing the problem.
In addition, although those events might not affect our daily life, they could significantly influence the whole society in future and creat serious problems. Because some influence is invisible and in the long term it could considerably influence our living. For example, the reason why wars are happening around eastern Asia is that there is abundant gasoline in those countries. As is known to us all, gasoline can be extremely precious in that they cannot be produced by techniques. In this scenario, in order to solve this matter, deals need to be made fairly and every country can benefit from the contracts of gasoline. If we are successfully equipped with the skills of making deals in this event, we can also profit a lot in our own work.
Furthermore, some events might not benefit us or affect us, but they could influence our offsprings. We are supposed to protect the earth to give our children a promising future. Private cars emit carbon dioxide which may jeopardize the ozone. Thus, when electronic cars have been invented and utilized in other countries, we'd better pay much attention to those cars which use only electricity instead of petrol and will not give out air pollution. For the future development, it is selfish that we destroy the environment. Instead, we should concentrate on the future influence, especially for our offsprings.
All in all, events that don't necessarily happen may seem unimportant to some people, but it is crucial for us to know about them because we can get useful solutions from them. Importantly, we have to provide our children a better environment using advanced skills and techniques.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: WED_WE_D[1]
Message: Did you mean 'we'd'?
Suggestion: we'd
...tion from impacting seafood near China, wed better clearly know why this explosion ...
^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: WED_WE_D[1]
Message: Did you mean 'we'd'?
Suggestion: we'd
...vented and utilized in other countries, wed better pay much attention to those cars...
^^^
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... offsprings. All in all, events that dont necessarily happen may seem unimportant...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 9.8082437276 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95100222717 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62028406133 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521158129176 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2541977135 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.045454545 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4090909091 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31818181818 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150743769257 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437312258144 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442836571489 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868872585082 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348152977541 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.