Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "It is more effective to study in a group of students than to study alone."
There is no big shortage to study alone or study with a group. In my opinion, the more effective one is studying with other pupils as a group. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, groups include different backgrounds and variety of knowledge. In addition, a student who is willing to share all the pieces of information that has its spirit of sharing. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a student in secondary school, I had a big assignment to complete a group. The assignment had to conclude with all the people in the group, so we decided to perform by one by. End of the project, various pieces of information were used. Thus, the assignment accomplished. As a result of dealing with homework as a big group, I developed a strong knowledge and decided to work as a big team hereupon. For this reason, I do strongly believe that it is worthwhile to study in a group.
Secondly, students who study in the groups are exposed to other students form many of different communication perspective. Group works are usually comprised of the different type of students. Maybe you had never talked before, that is a new way to know new people closely. For instance, when I was with other pupils during the common homework, I learned lots of new significant things. We interacted each other. I think I won so many beneficial interactions.
In conclusion, I do believe that is better for children to study in groups than study alone. This is because groups have the different type of students with different bits of knowledge and because students have different various communication perspective which helps to develop yourself.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, i feel, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 296.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75675675676 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87783112422 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506756756757 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8332730015 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.4 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288945998504 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847660437335 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949575222492 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194549216771 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701361338864 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.