Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Most people in the world think that working for shorter hours have more benefits. Personally, I believe having more days off has higher values. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, If you have two more days for weekend, you can plan to spend more time with family which can help you to restore your energy. Also, having two compelite days brings you the opportunity to do your personal activities and can focus on yourselfe better. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. Once, I was working in a company that provide us the option wether we could stay longer at office and have two extera day off, or working for shorter hours in a day but more days in week. I personally choosed to stay longer at office and have two extera days for my hollyday. In that situation, I was able to plan better for my weekend and could do every one of my personal activity that I wasn't able to do during the week. Moreover, I had the opportunity to stay more at home with my family and helping them and even cooking togheder, which is a fun and great cooaporation. So, I could back to work with higher level of energy.
Furthermore, working for fewer days in week can improve the level of productivity. People can still fresh enough for facing challenges and handling difficulties. Also, they won't loose their temper because of the high pressure. Human are not robots and they need enough time for rest and spending some times far from the fast and stressfull living that we have these days. By having an extera day off, people can plan for short trips for visiting new places and being in touch with nature, which is so important for reducing the amount of mental disease such as deppression or anxiety.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that this is better idea if we could work for fewer days in week eventhogh we have to stay for longer hours at job. This is because having upportunity for spending more time with family and doing personal activities, and having higher level of productivity at work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 518, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...hours in a day but more days in week. I personally choosed to stay longer at office and have two e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 718, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...very one of my personal activity that I wasnt able to do during the week. Moreover, I...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... handling difficulties. Also, they wont loose their temper because of the high pressu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, i feel, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58648648649 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45316837214 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489189189189 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.401927642 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2777777778 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380979688805 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131058189483 0.076458572812 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915986988684 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257959610949 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052241916671 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.