It goes without saying that in this complicated and progressive era in which we live in, all human beings are always striving to increase their work efficiency in a working environment and also have much time to be with their family. Whereas some individuals debate that working long hours for a limited number of days is better than working shorter hours three days a week for, on the other side of the continuum, stand other people, believing that this is not a great idea. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with this mental attitude that working for three days is beneficial to people. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be substantiated by underlying reasons.
To begin with, one of the most paramount points that dramatically impacts work efficiency is how much time a person has to rest. If a person has four days a week to rest, he will be able to save much energy and be energetic for the next week. In this situation, most of the mistakes that normally occurs due to exhaustion will be eliminated. An example can shed some light on the subject. Several years ago, when I worked eight hours each day for Tesla Company and my working days were from Monday to Friday, I did not have much time to rest for the next week. I told this story to my boss and he changed my working days from Wednesday to Friday but fourteen hours each day. It is true that that was actually a heavy working program but I got pleasant because I had much time to rest. This really increased my working efficiency and led to the previous problems and mistakes due to overtiredness did not happen anymore.
Moreover, changing working days from five days to three days in a week helps any individual has much more leisure time to be with his family and creates some enjoyable plans and opportunities for his free time. This obviously impacts the improvement of the family relations and assists it to be stronger and deeper. An example can drive this notion home. My father is working for the oil company as a design engineer. Several years ago, when he worked 5 days a week, I did not have much time to have interaction with him and talk about my social and economic problems. In addition, I and my family were not even able to have a trip because my father was always busy. This adversely affect our relations at home and most of the time, we had a huge argument and discussion. Eventually, he changed his working hours as well as days which led to having more time to be with us. I remembered that after this phenomenon, we had a great trip to Australia and after several years, I saw that my mother was laughing again.
To wrap it up, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of opinion that working for three days a week for long hours is much better and enjoyable than working for five days a week for a shorter time. This is because it creates much more leisure time for you to be with your family and also get energy for the next week. Therefore, it is highly recommended to work three days a week because it will have lots of changes to your life which are conspicuous and noticeable.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TOEFL T P O 41 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TOEFL T P O 18 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Torreya Taxifolia tree decline and migration 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, well, whereas, as to, in addition, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2561.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 568.0 407.700716846 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5088028169 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52308266152 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433098591549 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 807.3 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4921950433 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.708333333 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348714588471 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110159175077 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101343004038 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269469761038 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867788412287 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.