It goes without saying that in this sophisticated and progressive era in which we live in, all human beings are always striving to have the best viewpoint and perspective toward subjects because this actually plays a pivotal and crucial role in our decision. Whereas some individuals debate that it is much better to read the news from sources which their standpoints are a close resemblance to our perspective, on the other side of the continuum, stand others, believing that reading and watching the news presented by persons who have different points of view from us is more significant. As far as I am concerned, I categorically concur with the second mental attitude. In the ensuing essay, my perspective will be substantiated by underlying and conspicuous reasons.
To begin with, one of the most paramount points through reading or watching news from different views is that it helps us to increase our general knowledge about the subject and being familiar with other people’s mental attitude and points of view. This dramatically affects our decisions in the future and helps us make a better decision. An example can successfully drive this notion home. Several years ago, I participated in the presidential election. Initially, I decided to Hassan Rouhani because I really thought that he was successful in all his discussions with other candidates. However, when I talked to my friends which their points of view did not fit with me, I realized that he is actually not the appropriate candidate who can assist my country to become prosperous in the future. Therefore, those arguments positively affect my decision in the election.
Moreover, it is no secret to anyone and all individuals in the world are not complete, consequently, it is possible that their attitudes toward the news may be not true. To be more specific, if a person read or listen to the views which are not analogous to his attitude, he will be able to evaluate different ways of thinking and finally find the best one which is effectively constructive and instructive. An example can shed some light on this subject. A time when I was studying in elementary school, I was really interested in following the news related to my favorite team from a national source in my country. I remembered that an argument happened between two players, and as a result, a player was kicked off from the team. That source analyzed that he is delinquent. Under such a circumstance, if I did not talk to my friends about this, it would not have revealed to me that that source’ news and my attitude was obviously wrong.
To wrap it up, taking into account the aforementioned reasons and examples, I am of opinion that watching the news represented from different points of view is more paramount than reading them form resources which have the same mental attitude like us. This is because we will be able to be acquainted with other constructive standpoints and also will cause to change our viewpoint if it is not correct.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 882, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
... this, it would not have revealed to me that that source' news and my attitude was o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'changing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: changing
...ructive standpoints and also will cause to change our viewpoint if it is not correct.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, finally, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, whereas, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 72.0 43.0788530466 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2502.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 507.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9349112426 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93687899295 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497041420118 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 782.1 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1859324946 48.9658058833 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.1 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.35 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18256005489 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474039601103 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702641376615 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125316052013 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236457771995 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 10.002688172 270% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.