Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Todays modern societies´ needs are constantly evolving. How governments distribute public funds is always root of debate. Some people agree that government should invest on technological aspects such as improving Internet access. Nevertheless, I believe that more support should be directed to the improvement of public means of transport. Transportation has always been an essential aspect of modern societies. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, public transportation benefits many people from different social and economic levels. In many countries public transportation is a basic need since owning private cars can be quite expensive. For instance, in my country most of people rely on public means of transportation such as trains and buses for their daily commuting activities. Without efficient transportation, daily routines would be more difficult and stressful, decreasing overall well-being among citizens. On the other hand, the penetration rate of smartphones and computers is not relatively high. Therefore, not many citizens are in need of Internet access. Public transport, however, is a common need among people, regardless of their socioeconomic level. Furthermore, it also benefits people in the sense that it would increase their productivity levels since they would not get stuck in traffic jams. Moreover, people would be able to get to their workplaces faster and in a more convenient way.
Secondly, efficient means of transportation encourages economic activity. If people do not have ways to move from one place to another easily, activities such as studying and working would be limited and it would create a great disadvantage for those who do not own private vehicles. For instance, if a city has an efficient transportation system, more people would be able to commute to work and study and companies would not have a hard time filling job positions. Remote areas that lack transport systems generally find it more difficult to hire people since not many people would be willing to work somewhere that does not have an easy way to get there. Public transport allows people to take jobs that are even far from their house, hence, increasing economic activity everywhere.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that more support should be given to improving the public transportation at every country. Transportation is a basic need for many people. The social well-being and quality of life of a country would increase with a reliable transport system. In addition, greater economic activity would be encouraged, even in areas outside the main cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... expensive. For instance, in my country most of people rely on public means of transportation ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in a more convenient way. Secondly, efficient means of transportation encour...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37980769231 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03139010992 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524038461538 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0795087807 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136269462697 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479699035878 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522314738992 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105403890468 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563999056709 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.