Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are differentr
The Human being is such a creature that its psychological aspects, personal likings, similarities, and dissimilarities can't be justified via a regular rule. From this basic scenario, it is quite vivid that upon a particular subject, man's view varies innumerable ways. So to discern the exact meaning and significance of a subject is cumbersome in respect of a low talented person. In order to distinguish the proper thought of a topic, the average talented person should study the opinion of dissimilar ones. Otherwise, the real truth will not be expressed to thyself.
To embark on, whenever someone is well-informed of a topic as positively or negatively, he must spend his times to bring about the new findings of different opinions. If he uses his times to read the similar news, he will learn nothing. Rather it had better seem for him if he searches different opinion based news and articles. So surely he will gain myriad knowledge about this topic. For example, from my childhood, I knew there is no water on Mars. As a result, I didn't follow any articles against it, rather followed only its sides. All on a sudden, I found an article of its dissimilar opinion. At first, I did not show any eager to study it. But when I completed it, I gathered countless knowledge about it and I thought in near future, scientists will prove it. Now it is well proof.
In addition, following different news and article paves a way of mending our errors. If I have scarce information about a topic, by reading different opinion based articles, we can enrich ourselves. From my experience, I believed that eating maples is deleterious. As a result, I don't even touch any book of its reciprocal opinion. In the long run, it was a wrong belief. Last Monday I studied about its usefulness and all points. From that article, I have got intelligible information that it is a healthy food.
Furthermore, reading different opinion based article makes our power of intelligibility higher. As a result, we can easily understand the logic of policy. Especially when political news is published, it makes us discombobulated. For instance, I am a supporter of BJP. Last year a movement of injustice killing of Muslim aroused. At first, I believed it was wrong and the deception of Congress. But when I studied the different opinion of another newspaper, I understood the deception of Congress. Actually, a Muslim was downtrodden by a Hindu. This concept was an issue of a congress. So from that moment, I learned how to manipulate exaggerated news.
To wrap it up, in order to keep pace with the society, to mend an illogical aspect, to be aware of social point and to remove the darkness of mind, to be open is quite invariably a must. So only reading similar opinion based article can't recondite our instinctive knowledge whereas articles dissimilar to me broaden our outlook of thinking power.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ings, similarities, and dissimilarities cant be justified via a regular rule. From t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 237, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...he similar news, he will learn nothing. Rather it had better seem for him if he search...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 468, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ere is no water on Mars. As a result, I didnt follow any articles against it, rather ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...g maples is deleterious. As a result, I dont even touch any book of its reciprocal o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...y reading similar opinion based article cant recondite our instinctive knowledge whe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2393.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 492.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86382113821 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95299043711 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538617886179 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.94265232975 324% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.6003584229 165% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3395849136 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.3823529412 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4705882353 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38235294118 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0585175007314 0.236089414692 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0133502032912 0.076458572812 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219439965876 0.0737576698707 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0331307242791 0.150856017488 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00755727627636 0.0645574589148 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.