Undoubtedly, our lives constantly evolving around the information that we apprehend from our surrounding. News has a major effect to shape individuals mindsets and beliefs. In this regard, some people adhere to this notion that we should only expose ourselves to news that are similar to our interests. However, others hold the opposite view asserting that it is important to subscribe to news that are different from ours. Personally, I am in accord with the latter and the following are the reasons substantiating my view.
To begin with, following news from a variety of sources, most of which are not in line with our mindsets, helps us to gain a thorough knowledge on those that mattes to us. Our mindsets, shaped by the type of information we have continuously been subjected, develops a subjective filter which our minds analyzes affairs only through this lens. Hearing facts that are not compatible with our predefined stereotypes enables us to see news differently. To elaborate on this, take my personal experience as an example. A while ago, as a result of frivolous facts that the media has instilled into my mind, I thought that American people are evils and they are the number one enemy of the state, that was the propaganda which the national television broadcasted constantly and I started to believe and find it convenient to support this ideology. So, I hated to hear any fact that was different to the ones that I believed. After I grew up and had access to the internet, I met people that believed in friendship between nations and pondering on their feeds on social media, enlightened me. In fact, that was the first time I found out that some of the facts about American people had been notoriously fabricated by the government and the truth was tainted.
Moreover, if we practice ourselves to tolerate news and facts differing from our own beliefs, it enables us to cultivate a peaceful and tolerant personality which would be helpful if we decide to live in a multicultural society. Today, societies has been more intertwined than ever and being able to live in peace with people of different social and cultural background, which some of them have radically opposing views from yours in topics like politics and religion, is a gifted ability. As a result, a simple and free of charge practice is to open your ears and mind to contrasting views in your surrounding and evolve a personality that believes every human being has the right to express and stand for their opinions.
To sum up, given all the facts and examples in the above, I believe that it is imperative to subscribe and follow news from different views. This is because not only it broadens our insight and helps us to look into affairs from different angles, but also it makes us to develop into a more peaceful character.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'thorough knowledge'.
Suggestion: thorough knowledge
...ine with our mindsets, helps us to gain a thorough knowledge on those that mattes to us. Our mindset...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1136, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hat was the first time I found out that some of the facts about American people had been no...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, while, in fact, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 73.0 43.0788530466 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84057971014 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75625739908 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7331797606 48.9658058833 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.888888889 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204532521791 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693159244183 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610182851075 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140474923792 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046060915397 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.