The universe is infinite and unknown to human beings and, as we all know, humans have always craved to explore the unknown. However, in our world, there has always been a mixed feeling about space explorations. In this vein, there is a controversy between people who believe that it is essential to explore the unknown in the deep space and government should commit to supporting such explorations, and those holding an opposite view that allotting financial aids to such activities is a fancy way to waste money. Personally, I am in accord with the former view and the following are the reasons substantiating my view.
To begin with, digging into the deep space provides the opportunity for humans to find potential celestial plants that might contain an abundance of invaluable resources that on Earth are vital yet rare. Photos and sampling data acquired from space missions conducted by space explorers have already proved that the moon has large quantities of helium 3 which is a crucial element in nuclear fusion technology. To put it more vividly, nuclear fusion is a promising process, the same process occurring inside stars that empowers those gigantic galactic masses, that, if commercialized, would supply the energy demand of the world without having the risk of leaving dangerous radioactive wastes in current power plants operating based on the nuclear fission process. Accordingly, Allocating financial resources to identify other planets with such invaluable materials and more important than that, reducing the cost of mining and transportation of the raw materials are hardwired with the survival of humans in the future.
Moreover, sponsoring further space explorations enables scientists to determine the potential threats to Earth from outer space, so it allows us to be prepared to take proper measures to such threats. To elaborate on this, we are now fully aware, thanks to the scientific studies, of a vast number of meteorites and comets moving at insane speeds capable of bringing catastrophe if their track veers into Earth. Notwithstanding, space is so boundlessly immense and certainly there are greater dangers that we have not yet discovered. As a result, Investment on space projects and explorations assist governments to detect any serious threat before befalls on us and to be prepared to take proper measures to deal with them.
To Sum up, given all the points and examples provided above, I believe that it is essential for the government to financially support space projects. This is because not only it enables them to find valuable resources of rare and crucial materials outside Earth, but also it helps them to become aware of potential threats to Earth and be prepared to counter them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re the reasons substantiating my view. To begin with, digging into the deep spa...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the survival of humans in the future. Moreover, sponsoring further space explo...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ake proper measures to deal with them. To Sum up, given all the points and exam...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, moreover, so, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2301.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19413092551 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82455292948 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577878103837 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.500246305 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.357142857 100.406767564 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6428571429 20.6045352989 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173523994285 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630246212091 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485049264769 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103045240757 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00906924344837 0.0645574589148 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 11.7677419355 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.