Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

It is crystal clear that from the dawn of human beings there have been always a controversial debate among people in which they need to prioritize different choices on which the governments can spend money. In the past when people lived in small herds, they had the concern of making a decision about spending resources for the herd's members in the best way likewise nowadays in which governments have the same concern. With this in mind, I, personally, think that the merits of spending money on public transportation overweight the advantages of investing on improving internet access due to the below reasons:

To begin with, nowadays, the common debate about conserving the environment becomes more heated by inventing technologies which have harmful effects on the environment. Hence, by increasing the factors contributing to the environment pollution, governments require to pay attention to decreasing these factors rather than developing new technologies like the internet. Because, if Earth is contaminated enough in such a way that living on it is not possible, how people want to use novel technologies when they do not have any place to live? In this regard public transportation can decline utilizing individual cars and consequently air pollution.

Second, the most vital concern of common world's human beings is financial problems which are the elements of modern life. People all over the world suffer from the financial strain, which living in the prevalent situation, put on them. Considering this fact, governments need to help people's life live in a way in which they can control their stress and enjoy their time. One of the governments' contribution in this regard is to cut the living cost such as cost of transportation which can come to reality by developing public transportation. As a result, people will use this kind of transportation instead of their individual cars for their commuting and decrease the cost of everyday life so that their concern of financial problems will decline partially and they will have a more healthy life.

To sum up, taking all the above into consideration, improving public transportation has something to do with protecting Earth in order to remain an appropriate place to live along with decreasing the monetary pressure of everyday life which people experience. If governments can address the most crucial concerns of their societies appropriately, we will have a world in which everyone will enjoy living in.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nternet access due to the below reasons: To begin with, nowadays, the common deba...
^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'paying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: paying
...ironment pollution, governments require to pay attention to decreasing these factors r...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...stress and enjoy their time. One of the governments contribution in this regard is to cut t...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, likewise, second, so, kind of, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23366834171 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99350850245 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510050251256 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.8447136415 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.230769231 100.406767564 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6153846154 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143598873121 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531093545454 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466940760462 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998084697202 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404991766942 0.0645574589148 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 11.7677419355 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.