Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to
improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the technological advancement, the lifestyle of people increase so rapidly and people also depends more on technology like the internet, cellphone, public transport for communication and transfer information. There are a plethora of people content that government should spend money to improve the facility of public transportation but others disagree. Not surprisingly, the number of controversies over this issue is overwhelmed. Among this controversy, I cogently prefer the first one. There are several reasons for holding this opinion which I will elaborate followings.
To commence with, the internet makes the world like a global village. It makes our life so comfortable that people now easily communicate with one another from different parts of the world within a few seconds. Moreover, using internet people can easily access, share the information which was not possible before. Besides, people can acquire knowledge from google, youtube which provides various information about astronomy, geology, physics, engineering etc. from home. For particular, a few years ago I was in hospital but my exam was nearby and I could not able to attend several classes physically. But, my professor's lecture was uploaded to youtube channel and from that source, I attended every class from the hospital and also provided many significant notes for my term final. This is not only the case, from kids to olds internet is involved with our life indisputably. Kids and old people can enjoy various entertainment program from home instead of the cinema hall, theatre etc. Moreover, the physically disturb people can attend the various program, class through the internet instead of travelling.
The exquisite point is that the internet does not provide any kind of environmental pollution rather it makes life convenient. But, transportation creates noise, sound pollution and also air pollution. Moreover, public bus release harmful gas like carbon-di-oxide which increase the temperature of the global and also cause of the geen-house effect. If government support more the number of transportation rise sharply and produce more pollution. For instance, a city like Dhaka and Mumbai the problem caused by transportation is increasing day by day. If this rate is increased more these cities will no longer place to live. Therefore, gas released from the vehicles provides a negative impact on the public's health like a breathing problem.
To recapitulate, by examining various fact personally I think the government should provide more support for the Internet because it is a good source of gain knowledge and explore new things. Moreover, all age range of people is benefited from it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 554, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ransportation is increasing day by day. If this rate is increased more these citie...
^^
Line 9, column 704, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...icles provides a negative impact on the publics health like a breathing problem. T...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for instance, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2283.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44868735084 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9631895401 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55369928401 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 722.7 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7307943902 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2608695652 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2173913043 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08695652174 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151663752696 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428949711706 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482774325046 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100735534299 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383854239501 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.