Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news
presented by people who have similar views than the news presented by those who have different views from
Nowadays, people have various access to the news about every aspects in their life with the emergence and increasing popularity of new technologies like smart phones, televisions and the most important one, the internet. Different people have different preference towards diversified kinds of news and sometimes they also share the news they have heard about to their friends, families and colleagues. The vast majority of people may concern that it is more beneficial for them to read or watch the news brought about by people who always share the common ground with them rather than by those who have different perspectives from them, because it can avoid the conflicts between them. However, I definitely disagree with the statement since I believe that these two kinds of news are equally important to us.
For starters, the news shared by people who always have the similar views with us is conducive to our personal relationship with others. One of the major elements that sustain excellent human relations lies in extensive communication between people. In most cases, having similar opinions provide great topics for discussion. As the two share a great deal of common ground, an in-depth talk is more than likely. During the course of exchanging ideas, much can be gained and mutual understanding can be strengthened as well. In a sense, it paves the way for establishing stable human relationships. Therefore, watching and discussing the news showed by people who have similar views with us is a good way to stabilize our interrelationships. For instance, I am always willing to watch the news presented by my friend since we are both inclined to approve the rights of females, thus we never debate with regard to this issue and always have a number of opinions to express.
However, although the news shared by people who have similar perspectives with us is of great significance, there is no reason to refuse watching the ones presented by people who often have diametrically different views from us. Because it enables us to learn from different an refreshing perspectives, which can contribute to the cultivation of critical thinking. For instance, if we accept the news from people who always hold different opinions, we can acquire the opportunities to know more about the news which we have never paid much attention to and learn more about these unfamiliar fields. Also, through discussion regarding the current events with people who bring about them, we can gain a new sight to view the world, thus we can cultivate our competence of critical and creative thinking. By contrast, if we merely watch or read the news showed by people who are similar to us, our knowledge as well as ways of thinking will be all the same without novelty.
In sum, the news from people who resembled us is equally significant as the ones from people different from us. It is crucial for us to know about each of them for the sake of stable friendship as well as critical thinking.
- Some companies in the United States have developed "wellness" programs that give rewards or incentives to employees for achieving certain health-related goals, such as stopping smoking or losing weight. The rewards and incentives include cash pr 90
- The following appeared in a business magazine."As a result of numerous complaints of dizziness and nausea on the part of consumers of Promofoods tuna, the company requested that eight million cans of its tuna be returned for testing. Promofoods concl 42
- Most spiders build webs of some type. These webs are made from a sticky, silk-like substance that spiders produce naturally. There are two main kinds of webs: orb webs and cobwebs. While both are able to capture and hold prey. it is the orb web that is mu 75
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands had become extinct. Yet humans cannot have been a factor in the species' extinctio 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF
Message: Use simply 'During'.
..., an in-depth talk is more than likely. During the course of exchanging ideas, much can be gained an...
Line 9, column 276, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
...e it enables us to learn from different an refreshing perspectives, which can cont...
Line 9, column 290, Rule ID: A_PLURAL
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'perspective'?
...s to learn from different an refreshing perspectives, which can contribute to the cultivatio...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, all the same, as well as, in most cases, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2495.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 501.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98003992016 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77730865637 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457085828343 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 770.4 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0112639473 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.315789474 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3684210526 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47368421053 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420065616497 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139894261469 0.076458572812 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11235672604 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272587178146 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796293011244 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.