Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

The argument for governments to focus more on improving internet access than to improve public transportation is a long standing term. In my point of view, spending more money on the internet access is much more beneficial with on doubt.
There may be someone believes that a better public transportation leads to greater financial income but they just forget to take the cost of it in count. For instance, establishing a subway system for a city will cause a millions of money to make it come true meanwhile design a series of web sites for citizen to browse information only takes a unnecessary number of recourse. So, it is very clear that improving internet access is a cheaper but useful way to promote the quality of citizen`s life.
On the other hand, during this generation, information has a value cannot be replaced by anything else. Once people maintain an open access to the information, they can grasp chances to develop themselves. In this case, the importance of internet accesses are beyond compare. With variable accesses to the internet, it allows citizen to adopt the information in need, using it for accomplish their goals.
At last, improving internet access can also do the favor of making governments stuffs transparent. Citizens need an easy way to know what the government do and how can it affect them. Having more accesses of internet is a major part to achieve this requirement. Only if we are exactly aware of the policies which are in turn, we can choose the direction we go.
Above all of these three points I believe that governments should spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 7, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
... more beneficial with on doubt. There may be someone believes that a better public t...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: 'a million'
Suggestion: a million
...g a subway system for a city will cause a millions of money to make it come true meanwhile...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a million' or simply 'millions'?
Suggestion: a million; millions
...g a subway system for a city will cause a millions of money to make it come true meanwhile...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...itizen to browse information only takes a unnecessary number of recourse. So, it ...
^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'open access'.
Suggestion: open access
... by anything else. Once people maintain an open access to the information, they can grasp chan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 280.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93214285714 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85881870495 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8822692896 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6428571429 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369516525518 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129351440631 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109225037374 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227907008498 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112307891035 0.0645574589148 174% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.