Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.

Probably, it will not be a secret if I write that it is extremely critical for the government to decide how much budgets to allocate to different projects in the country and manage them well. Hence, for every decision, there is a committee to make a program and study the needs of a country. In this regard, it is a long-lasting discussion among the scholars whether a government should invest more to the Internet improvement or to transportation. Personally, I am convinced that the government should pay more attention to the transportation, rather then to the Internet. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I discuss in the following paragraphs.

The first exquisite point to be mention is that despite the variety of options the Internet can suggest, the transportation is a vital part of the society, and with transport issues the stress and time waste would be unavoidable. For instance, my country is famous with the traffics and with awful asphalt quality on roads. In this harsh conditions, my friend, who works in an office with high speed Internet, needs to wake up three hours earlier to be on time in work. Although the day only starts for him, he is already stressed and with a headache. Were he to have an opportunity to avoid traffics, he would be in a happy mood, even if the Internet would be slow.

Equally essential to the previous reason concerning why governments should pay more attention to the transport is that the Internet requires the use of electronic devices; however, not all of the population can afford them. Yet, the investment on roads, highways, subways and other kind of things related to transportation will obviously affect to larger group of people. Also, it will create links in a society. Drawing for my country’s experiment, once some transport problems were solved, the people became more social, because they could access to many locations in or out their city; nevertheless, they become more connected to each other, despite the distance.

In the light of the above mentioned reasons, I truly believe that governments should consider investing to transportation in the first place. It would be much beneficial due to the amount of people they would have an influence and due to the time and stress issues they would solve.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-21 Take 70 view
2023-04-08 younessam 70 view
2023-03-13 Mohf89 70 view
2023-03-13 saharmnd 76 view
2023-03-13 saharmnd 76 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...itical for the government to decide how much budgets to allocate to different projec...
^^^^
Line 1, column 553, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...attention to the transportation, rather then to the Internet. I feel this way for tw...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...even if the Internet would be slow. Equally essential to the previous reason concer...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...use of electronic devices; however, not all of the population can afford them. Yet, the in...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, well, for instance, i feel, kind of, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9173126615 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87038351962 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542635658915 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3416297292 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.9375 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1875 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206233918005 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647302275305 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418305987375 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113624815329 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513117545688 0.0645574589148 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.