Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Undoubtedly, our modern life is much more complicated than the past, and governments have limited budget to spend. While many people believe that the government should spend money to improve Internet access, others agree with the obverse idea. Nevertheless, from my point of view, I think it would be better, if government spend money to improve public transportation. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, public transportation has plenty of critical impacts on people lives. In fact, a better public transportation, which needs a large amount of money to be created, can improve quality of life in people of a society. The government by spending money on traveling systems and funding private companies will enhances people's satisfaction. Moreover, a novel transportation systems are less harmful for the envirnoment and produce slight amount of air pollotion, which is a major public health issue today. To cast light on this, in my country, the government has been started to create new subway train systems in big cities that are fast and very cheap for passengers. Although our internet access is not better than other countries, people still find new transportation system more useful than the internet. Consequensly, people are satisfied by novelty and cost of these transportations systems, which was not possible by improving internet access, at least in my country.
Furthermore, only small percent of people use internet as a practical tool for shopping, or a way to avoid meeting their families that lives far away. In contrast, a lot of people like traditional ways of shoppying, and almost all people of a country need to use the public transportation. This is obvious that the government should spend the money based on how many people will get benefit from new budget funding approach. For example, in our capital, ten million people spend almost one hour in public buses or subway trains. If the bus stations and buses don't have a effective and new cooling system, people will bother and annoyed for houres in hot summers. As the public transportation is very crucial for most of people in my country, whitout having a good transportation, improvment in other facilities will not satisfy people.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the government should spend money to improve public transportation. this is because this can be more benefitial for society and envrnoment. Also, this help a lot of people comperd to internet access.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'enhance'
Suggestion: enhance
...tems and funding private companies will enhances peoples satisfaction. Moreover, a novel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y trains. If the bus stations and buses dont have a effective and new cooling system...
^^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...If the bus stations and buses dont have a effective and new cooling system, peopl...
^
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...blic transportation is very crucial for most of people in my country, whitout having a good tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...money to improve public transportation. this is because this can be more benefitial ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, while, at least, for example, i feel, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12926829268 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93906082358 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0722231846 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.15 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347968666068 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11875880561 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749284525114 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258739583693 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863244352714 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.