Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

With the increasing power of governmenr in recent decades, there is a dispute about the their tasks and duties. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether governements should spend money on development of internet rather than public transportation. I personally contend that although governments might have possitive effects on advancement of internet and its access, they ought to spend mony on public transportation.To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstandinf reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that civil engineering projects need enormous sources which merely governments can afford to provide. In other words, due to the expensive cost of developing public transportation projects such as, buying bus, constructing underground stations, and also their maintanance, private enterperises could not afford them. In addition, public transportation plays a pivotal role in economy and industry of countries. You can suppose what a catastrophic situation would be, if a disturbance ocures in a public transportation network of a city like NewYork. As a result, governments have to take measures in this field.
The second rationale behind this issue is rooted in the fact that the experience of recent decades have demonstrated that when it comes to high tech advancement, private sector might have better functionality. In other words, owing to the conducive environment of pravate companies for development of novel ideas as well as their peoper relationship with universities, they probably would be more successful compared to governments. Indeed, private companies can provide better foundation for improvement of internet access. In order to make more clear, consider my personal experience as a real case. In my country, according to the legislated rule, government have obliged to provide access of remote villages to the internet. However, passing many years from this legislation this aim have not been achieved.
In brief, contemplating all the aformentioned reasons, one soon realize that although it is ideal that governments take measures to improve both public transportation and the internet access, when it comes to reality they are uncapable of doing both. Thus, if we want to choose one of these tasks to be done by government, in my opinion, we should opt for public transportation.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ecent decades, there is a dispute about the their tasks and duties. A controversial quest...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 455, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
... to spend mony on public transportation.To substantiate my point of view, the foll...
^^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...nf reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: TO_TOO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...es have demonstrated that when it comes to high tech advancement, private sector m...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, thus, well, in addition, in brief, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50526315789 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2334213846 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5732679084 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233470276846 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702734931259 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516136558963 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137204849912 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245401568289 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ecent decades, there is a dispute about the their tasks and duties. A controversial quest...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 455, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
... to spend mony on public transportation.To substantiate my point of view, the foll...
^^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...nf reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: TO_TOO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...es have demonstrated that when it comes to high tech advancement, private sector m...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, thus, well, in addition, in brief, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50526315789 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2334213846 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5732679084 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233470276846 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702734931259 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516136558963 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137204849912 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245401568289 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.