Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Human beings are social creatures; we all need to keep in contact with other people. In this regard, friends are a constituent part of individuals’ lives, and they play a paramount role in their either career or emotional life. The majority of people are impressed by their friends dramatically; therefore, having good friends can lead them to climb the ladder of success. On the contrary, bad friends can inhibit them from reaching their goals. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that cementing a friendship with an old friend is more valuable whereas, others hold exactly the opposite perspective. There is a saying that “old is gold”; therefore, I strongly believe that keeping your old friends is more important than striking up new friendships. In the following paragraphs I will delve into three conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The most significant point to be mentioned is that old friends are those with whom individuals can trust and share everything while, it takes time to build such a friendship with new people. In other words, trust between two friends is more strong compared to a recently developed friendship. Moreover, trust and honesty are two contributing factors in having a long-lasting friendship. As time passes, these characteristics develops, and they can be gained only by the elapse of time. On the other hand, you need to more time so as to establish a rapport with someone new and trust him as much as you did against your old friends.
It is important to bear in mind that old friends are those we have already spent our time together. Furthermore, Old friends are the people we are familiar with weaknesses and strengths of their friends. Take a personal experience as an example, my friend who is an introverted person and has Glossophobia, fear of public speaking, was invited to give a lecture. I was aware of her fear so, I arranged an appointment for her with a psychologist. Consequently, not only she overcame her phobia but also, her was a highly successful presentation. If I were not her old friend, she would not attend the conference in order to present her article.
Another paramount reason which should be referred to is that people spend more time with their friends and experience out precious moments together. To shed light on this issue, me and my friend lived within walking distance of our high school; therefore, every morning we walked to school. After years when we visited there, the past pleasant memories evoked. In addition, friendships are bonded as an elapse of time
To recapitulate, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that having a good relationship with old friends is more essential than building new rapports with new people. Old friendships creates many memories, trust and bonding between individuals which cannot be forgotten.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...evelops, and they can be gained only by the elapse of time. On the other hand, you need to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...n the other hand, you need to more time so as to establish a rapport with someone new an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... In addition, friendships are bonded as an elapse of time To recapitulate, all the afor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...endships are bonded as an elapse of time To recapitulate, all the aforementioned ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, as to, in addition, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2388.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04862579281 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90535799635 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536997885835 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9904318219 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.826086957 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5652173913 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65217391304 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298508454365 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870854432039 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773018654459 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17394170332 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664507082818 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.