Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Many people wonder whether it is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends?. In my opinion, even though making new friends is important, it is not as crucial as to maintain old friendships?. There are several reasons why I feel this way, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, a long lasting friendship is not a thing that can be easily established. It requires constant connection and thoughtful attitude from each person, which increases the value of the friendship. For example, if imagine someone has an old friend who lives in a different country and if they can manage to preserve their connection by meeting each other's countries, this represents how meaningful their friendship is for them. Whereas, new friendships lack this kind of effort people put for each other, thus, it can not reach the level of value that old friendships achieved.
Secondly, the more time people spend together, the better they know each other. Therefore they become capable of holding deep conversations which strengthens the bond between them. My personal experience is a compelling example of this, I have an old friend whom ı talk about my precious moments with. These conversations I have with him have led to the formation of a special friendship between us. In other words, we share many things with us that we may hesitate to share with our newer friends.
Lastly, new friends can be unpredictable. One should be prepared to deal with any kind of behaviour until spending adequate time with his new friend. On the other hand, old friends are reliable and do not surprise us, hence they deserve to be behaved more cautiously.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that old friendships are more worthwhile than new friendships. This is because the work to sustain it turns out to be a triumph, people tend to build stronger bonds when they know each other for a long time and old friends are more predictable. As a result ,in my view, it is vital to sustain old friendships rather than building a new one.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inion, even though making new friends is important, it is not as crucial as to ma...
^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ether, the better they know each other. Therefore they become capable of holding deep con...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...riends are more predictable. As a result ,in my view, it is vital to sustain old f...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, while, as to, for example, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in my opinion, in my view, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82336182336 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73420868099 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7663313761 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0555555556 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.45110844103 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272797740421 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967985753179 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100684454258 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179189633715 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114651167948 0.0645574589148 178% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.