Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, with the development of technology and modernity, citizens are laying more emphasis on internet connection and infrastructure. Personally, I believe it's equivalently or even more worthwhile to increase the budget of public transportation. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following assay.
To begin with, obviously there remains well-developed regions as well as outlying places. To help improve economy of those poorer areas thus increasing the overall development level of the bigger area, advanced transportation as well as matched infrastructure is built. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. I used to live in a small town and my family subsist on farming. Five years ago, with the complicated freeways construction, I was fortunately witnessing the process of the town's development. As the association with big cities surged, new buildings sprung up along with improving accommodation.
Besides, thanks to convenient traffic, not only people from far-away regions but also downtown residents can have trips around a copious of places. People from economically developed areas are able to take excursions to embrace natural world, while townspeople can either have commercial transaction or experience different lifestyles. Take my friend as the example. My friend Lily, who lives in the capital, is fascinated with natural landscape and often have trips during holidays. She feels really pleasant as recently a place that she has been always dreaming of visiting have a great improvement of transportation. There is a direct bus line created, connecting the airport and the scenic spot, which really benefits not only my friend but also many other tourists.
In conclusion, based on the arguments discussed above, I can safely draw the conclusion that public transportation may deserves more finance. This is because it brings up economical development and benefit citizens to conveniently travel around.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...d infrastructure. Personally, I believe its equivalently or even more worthwhile to...
^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'freeways'' or 'freeway's'?
Suggestion: freeways'; freeway's
...g. Five years ago, with the complicated freeways construction, I was fortunately witness...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'towns'' or 'town's'?
Suggestion: towns'; town's
...rtunately witnessing the process of the towns development. As the association with bi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 451, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'have' and 'trips'.
Suggestion: have often trips
...s fascinated with natural landscape and often have trips during holidays. She feels really pleas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...e finance. This is because it brings up economical development and benefit citizens to con...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, really, so, thus, well, while, as for, i feel, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 302.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56291390728 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22106978463 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652317880795 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9215639298 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8235294118 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126628837752 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369466013621 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347817543264 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788490872027 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039132321229 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.