Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Governments play a significant role in our society. There is no doubt that governments would encounter a problem of spending money on which plan. In this article, the issue whether governments should spend more money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation is under debate. However, in my opinion, I agree with the statement and the reasons are elaborated in the following paragraph.
First of all, in this rapidly changing world, information tends to shift in a blink. Due to the Internet, information could interact with each other in few minutes. Furthermore, people can receive the information from the other side of the earth without any limitation of boundary and time. Take news for example, thanks to the improvement of the Internet, we are plausible to watch the global news in anytime.
Therefore, if people would like to accept the global information, the Internet should be improved and advanced.
What's more, with the advance of the Internet, the works are likely to be efficient and precise. In fact, most works are based on the Internet to manipulate. Without advance of the Internet, the works are apt to be complicated and laborious. For example, those who are students used to search for the materials of essay by going to libraries before, nevertheless, students could rely on the Internet to finish their theses by some clicks nowadays.
On the other hand, some might argue that public transportation is the most important item for governments since it is necessary to each citizen. Moreover, through improving the public transportation, it could stimulate the tourism in the country and then economy would be better.
Based on the above analysis, prudent consideration is inevitable when it comes to whether governments should spend more money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. However, I agree with the statement for the receiving the information and efficiency of the work.(315)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...net should be improved and advanced. Whats more, with the advance of the Internet,...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 261, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...cated and laborious. For example, those who are students used to search for the materia...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, for example, in fact, no doubt, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26031746032 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95350038515 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51746031746 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6581665252 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4705882353 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382978441172 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109494629282 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950423100331 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197711089447 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127441052976 0.0645574589148 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.