Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the Government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer

Nowadays, allocating money to celestial travel is a major part of the budget of advanced countries. When it comes to this issue, some people believe that government funding for exploring the space is a sheer waste of money; however, I personally think that there are a number of benefits which can be achieved by traveling in space. I will enlarge on my reasons for its advantages in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, space travel is inextricably linked to collecting a considerable amount of new information with which governments can make a huge profit. To put it in a more vivid picture, governments can earn so good money that will compensate for expenses of space exploration. So, these kinds of explorations should not be contemplated as deeds wasting money. As a way of illustration, take some thriving countries. As a matter of fact, those countries almost always allocate a great deal of money to send spaceships to different parts of outer space in order to accumulate information. It is no more a secret to anyone that those countries are becoming wealthier than were they in the past. As a result, it cannot be a waste of money, since if it were, those countries would lose their money and would become poor.
The other advantage which deserves some words here lies in the fact that space exploration is worth it since it is possible that scientists find a new place for living during one of those space explorations. If it happens, governments will obtain money by sending people there. To clarify this point, due to the fact that the global population is increasing day after day, and the Earth is losing its abilities to tolerate this large amount of people. Thereby, human beings should discover a new place where has similar conditions like the Earth for living. To reach that end, governments have to send spacecraft to space in order to examine its situation. Take some space travels conducted by the US, for example. They found some empirical evidence with which people can think about living on the Mars or other planets because they are like the Earth to some extent. Consequently, although governments should pay for space explorations at first, these types of travel can have positive results for human beings, also governments can take advantages of that.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that governments should fund space travel since it has a lot of advantages for them. This is due to the fact that, not only can government collect a vast amount of valuable information, but also, they can find a new place for living. Both benefits can make money for governments.

Votes

Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: mjw0413

>>> more users practiced this essay topic. Check them out >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by the user:

>>> more essays by the user >>>

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'happens'?
Suggestion: happens
... of those space explorations, and if it happen, government which finds that place can ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, really, so, for example, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72466960352 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63122575769 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482378854626 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.0595343398 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.166666667 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227624713413 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888655015449 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634192182958 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174693871469 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519162336586 0.0645574589148 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.