Selecting the best professor has always played an inseparable part of students’ decisions in the beginning of each semester since it can pave the road of success for individuals. In this regard, some people believe that lecturers who are selected as the most popular one is the best choice, while some others think professors with wonderful research skills are superior to others. As far as I am concerned, I have enough reasons to suppose that the first idea carries more weight. I will enlarge on my explanations in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, teachers’ popularity is inextricably linked to their performances in classrooms, so opting popular teachers can cause to better understanding of students. To put it in a more vivid picture, students often like professors who teach lessons effectively by using new methods, as they go to universities to learn different things. Therefore, choosing the most famous professor lead to better understanding. That is due to the fact that almost all popular teachers are widely enjoyed because they can educate students as well as possible. As a way of illustration, take professors at my previous university. Students had to assess teachers at the end of each semester, and the university polished the list of the most renowned professor of each faculty. According to the university’ data, the most popular professor in each faculty was who taught lessons well during semester. Consequently, students can guarantee their understanding of lessons, should they choose the most popular professor.
Secondly, it is more likely that professors who receive rewards because of their fascinating research cannot teach students efficiently. That is due to the fact that they are more passionate about their research than teaching students, so they do not have enough time to allocate to students. Accordingly, it will not be a great choice, should students select courses taught by those professors since they will not be able to ask even their questions. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter is profoundly influenced by my own experience. One of the professors in my field was rewarded due to his outstanding research, and I had to select one of his courses because I did not have any other choice according to my schedule. The most famous sentence which he used during that course was “We all know this, so just let it go” whereas students did not know anything about that. In addition, he was just in class for half an hour since he always wanted to carry out a lot of other research in order to get new prizes. As a result, choosing professors who are rewarded of outstanding research is not a good idea, and students cannot learn many things from them.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that students should opt famous professors as their teachers, given the fact that, not only can students learn a number of lessons from them, but also they can be in touch with those professors during semester in order to solve their problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bettering', 'welling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: bettering; welling
...s, so opting popular teachers can cause to better understanding of students. To put it in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, in addition, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2522.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 505.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99405940594 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84825449551 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481188118812 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 766.8 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8108403453 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.095238095 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0476190476 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36676881076 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115502552142 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907596675635 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219807430235 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707427413243 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.