Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.

Throughout the history, space and travel in space play a vital role in people dream as well as in many fictional stories. A controversial question regarding this issue is whether it is worthy that governments invest money on travel in space and other thing related to it or otherwise. Some people believe that it is just wasting money and time on space, due to it is not our priority world and there are too many thing and problem that needs to invest money and time, whereas others disagree and saying this investment have long-term effects. I am of the opinion that; the more a government invest money and worker in travel in space and exploration outer of earth, the less would be able to gain things that improving people' lives and bring them facilities for some reasons. In ensuing lines, I will address the most discernible grounds.

The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that there are many urgent problems in human being that are preference rather than space and travel in space. In fact, by investing money on other things, for example, education, health food, helping to developing countries etc., would obtain short-term effects. To illustrate this, i would like to mention a result of a project in one of developing country that a government invest money to enhance education of children to create better life in future. After some years the outcomes of this investments were that most of the children could keep on their study in higher level and were useful for their country. As you can see, by investing money on some integral things for human being we will be able to create future of our world instead of investing on space.

Another noteworthy aspect that should be reflected in this explanation is that in today's state-of-the-art world, governments can invest money and time on advancement of technology and science to bring about people facilities. Needless to say, most of wars that are currently in the world, are owing to lake of knowledge about different thing and short of education that how a person must deal with such problems. However, exploration space is part of science and maybe will have substantial long-term effect on individual's lives, but the most significant thing is short-term effect on human. Consequently, investing money and time on technology and science have momentous outcomes, for instance, look at middle east, this area of world has been challenged by many wars, it can be avoiding of this catastrophic things by teaching people and provide facilities for them to open their mind. As a result, by science and advanced technology we can prevent of many wars throughout the world.

In light of these crucial reasons, I have strictly come to believe that investing money on space travel and exploration, is just waste of money that could be invest other useful things with short-term results. Given the above, by inverting this money other where instead of space, government not only can help children on developing country to make progress, but also can provide facilities for progressing science and technology.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
...ot our priority world and there are too many thing and problem that needs to invest money ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 424, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'problems'?
Suggestion: problems
... world and there are too many thing and problem that needs to invest money and time, wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...short-term effects. To illustrate this, i would like to mention a result of a pro...
^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ation of children to create better life in future. After some years the outcomes of this ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...uture. After some years the outcomes of this investments were that most of the child...
^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the wars') or simply say ''most wars''.
Suggestion: most of the wars; most wars
...out people facilities. Needless to say, most of wars that are currently in the world, are ow...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in fact, in short, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2565.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98058252427 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67780577955 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46213592233 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.9 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3214943573 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.882352941 100.406767564 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2941176471 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11764705882 5.45110844103 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200269300927 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782367676035 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545885690999 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150832880228 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570518224415 0.0645574589148 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.