Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public.
In the fast-paced and technology-oriented world, media plays a vital role in people's lives and teach one how to cope with problems as well as they orienting individuals' thoughts. Throughout the history, news help people triumph over obstacles and achieve success. A controversial question regarding this issue is whether it can be trust the media and other network site for giving news; they provide accurate news than in the past or otherwise. Some people believe that in nowadays the media that people use for being aware of news are less cared about correctly of news and most of them provide incorrectly information, whereas others have variant standpoints. I am of opinion that; the more technology making progress and coming new media for giving news, the less we can trust of the information for some reasons. In ensuing lines, I will address the most discernible grounds.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that in such media everybody can put every information without any source of them. In fact, in a media such as internet, there are many data without valid source, thus it is likely that we confront with inaccurate information. Take a personal experience as an example, back to in my last year of university when I was preparing my master thesis, I was looking for information about Ultra-cold atom -- a field of Quantum Optics that the researchers cool atoms down about Nano-kelvin -- I faced a new information about cold atoms; I used the data to my thesis and cited to that website. When I presented for my supervisor, he was excited about the information and we checked the website. Therefore, we figured out that the contents were entirely wrong. This experience taught me that, in internet there are many wrong information without any proper source.
Another noteworthy aspect that should be reflected in this explanation is that, in today's state-of-the-are world, the technology facility communication for people, and government, so everybody by the virtue of their goal such as politically goal etc., want to spread out their thoughts. Needless to say, government use media to attract views, so by means of these media can transfer inaccurate information to achieve their goal. As a case in point, there are a body of psychological research that I read recently. The researchers conducted an interview with many people in a specific country in order to find how many of these individuals trust the media that are related to their government, the data denoted that a host of them did not trust them and did not watch these media. On balance, this finding can partly explain why these media is intrinsic to becoming trustworthy in a given country.
I light of these crucial reasons, I have strictly come to believe that in nowadays, it is hard to trust news around us, and must seeking for source of them. For sake of brevity, a couple of points are worthy to reiterating; firstly, every boy can put information without source in for example internet, so there are not accurate; secondly, this news that we hear, there are goals behind them to attract our view in terms of politically. Albeit, it was a story in a nutshell; as a matter of fact, there are many reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my point of view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 471, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
... or otherwise. Some people believe that in nowadays the media that people use for being awa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a medium' or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: a medium; media
...without any source of them. In fact, in a media such as internet, there are many data w...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 851, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much wrong information', 'a good deal of wrong information'.
Suggestion: much wrong information; a good deal of wrong information
...e taught me that, in internet there are many wrong information without any proper source. Another n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...s, I have strictly come to believe that in nowadays, it is hard to trust news around us, an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at can lend weight to my point of view.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2709.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 552.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90760869565 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84713113593 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83061096414 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501811594203 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 849.6 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.1558431198 48.9658058833 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.45 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175259704524 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535404418167 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453105829889 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104777134917 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652476023124 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.